Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 144

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 01:38, 28 July 2014 (Archiving 9 discussion(s) from Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive 140←Archive 142Archive 143Archive 144Archive 145Archive 146→Archive 150

Krystal Boyd

Article was deleted for: (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). I would like access to the most recent version of the page, possibly in my userspace (as a draft), so I can work on improving the article. -(Rovinemessage) 11:56, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

no Unnecessary - Kelapstick has given the answer on his talk page.(Rovinemessage) 12:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Imperator Online

Development history for Mythic Entertainment; Partial history with Dark Age of Camelot; proposed MMO systems that don't work -Moonchips (talk) 23:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Marasmusine (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs references (a) to verify what it says, and (b) to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Journal of Health Sciences

I, Pranggio, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pranggio (talk) 07:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Pranggio: --S Philbrick(Talk) 14:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Youi Insurance

I, TrevorDev, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TrevorDev (talk) 05:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.@TrevorDev: I have restored it, (with reservations) but please take the concerns to heart. It does not simply need a little work, it needs a major rewrite. It does have some refs, so those may be useful, but if it not substantially rewritten, it will be rejected.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Nate Thomas

The article had participation and comments on whether to be deleted or not. There was not a consensus to delete. Although considered marginal whether the article meets WP:Creative and WP: Bare there were two deletes and two keeps and a strong interest in contributing to the article to improve it. Biographee has produced and directed award winning television PSAs and theatrically released films, received national commendations from FBI director Robert Mueller, and won an Emmy Award, the msot coveted award in his field. He is referenced in other Wikipedia articles, and as a tenured film professor viewed as an expert in his field having been quoted various times in major newspaer articles and journals. Biographee, upon my research, is also a member of the Board of Directors for LA36 television station and President of the California Faculty Association- the collective bargaining unit for California State University faculty. Speedy deletion of articles like this one challenges the integrity of Wikipedia. -Prease (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

 Not done This is not a speedy deletion, and we cannot restore articles deleted via AFD. You'll need to request a deletion review, or (probably better) contact the deleting admin and ask if they will userify the content to a draft for you to work on. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Enigma.io

The page was deleted citing no evidence for notability. However, such evidence exists and I request that the page be restored so that sources establishing notability can be added. Notability evidence includes a New York Times Article about the company, an interview with one of its founders on NPR, and an an article which establishes it as the winner of TechCrunch Disrupt, a large national tech startup competition. -Dandelany (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@Dandelany:  Done As a contested PROD, the article has been restored. The concerns about the content are still valid, and I've notified the original PRODer DGG (NYPL) (DGG) in case they feel an AFD discussion is merited. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enigma.io DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Council for Adult and Experiential Learning

I, Kacno1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kacno1 (talk) 22:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@Kacno1:  Done You might want to review the citation guide when you start working on this again, as well as the notability guidelines. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Ramakrishna Mission Shilpamandira Computer Centre

This page is about a very well known institute in West Bengal, please bring it back.

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The other deletion, a G11, also can't be restored for similar reasons. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Also this had a promotional tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tetryonics

I, 66.66.175.157, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.66.175.157 (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: Unsourced paper/essay about a fringe topic with little to no coverage in mainstream scientific sources. Not even going there. If another admin wants to give it a chance, I'm good. But I don't think it's worth it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Not done. Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. See the policy Wikipedia:No original research for further information. There is no point in restoring such content. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Msn classic sign in.png (and other MSN images)

This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Done and date extended for reuse. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katch 22

I, Mike-eastman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mike-eastman (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 12:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Twelfth Planet Press

Substantial changes to the subject since deletion, including multiple notable events with significant coverage in reliable secondary sources such as mainstream media -Editormum (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Not done. I can't unilaterally overturn the deletion decision, however it's been 4 years and the deletion was undertaken because the article didn't make a claim as to the importance of the subject. You can recreate the article and add sourcing so it's apparent it meets the basic guidance for inclusion on wikipedia or you may start a new draft via articles for creation where you can work on it at your leisure. If you'd like me to start a draft page for you with the content that was on the page in 2010 I'd be happy to do so. Let me know here or on my talk page. Protonk (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stacy Doris

I, Wattsirod, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wattsirod (talk) 01:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

I would like to continue working on this. Can you let me access the text?

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Audio Notebook

I, 98.169.107.221, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.169.107.221 (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • On a side note, you'll need to edit the article to make it more neutral and encyclopedic. It's not promotional per se, but it is written a bit more like a casual blog or news entry than would be comfortable. Just small tweaks here and there should do it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Neo-Catholic

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -208.59.156.220 (talk) 06:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eclectica

I, Zoltan.devenyi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zoltan Devenyi 07:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Social_pyramid

There is a portal block for social media & this is the only red link on said box. A stub or poorly cited article makes a better placeholder than a complete blank. -23.116.49.179 (talk) 06:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment: Hmm... from looking at the deleted version, part of the big rationale for its deletion was that it was written with an WP:OR tone. I can kind of see where they're coming from. I don't mind restoring it, but it will need to be improved or it will likely inevitably be deleted again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm looking for sources to see if there's anything I can throw up there, but I'm not finding a lot to show that this term is very frequently used. There are a few hits, but mostly in self-published sources and it's almost exclusively mentioned in relation to ancient Egypt in specific. I'm just concerned that if restored, it'll just be a brief reprieve before deletion. Being mentioned in the portal doesn't always mean that something should be listed there- sometimes it just means that someone added it and it needs to be removed. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • It could also be seen as a content fork of hierarchy or social class in many ways, although this article mentions intimacy. I'm just more than a little concerned that none of the sourcing I'm finding really uses this term in this specific manner and that deletion of some sort would be inevitable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Basically all I really want is some reassurance that you will try to work on the article (or get someone else to work on it) after I restore it and that there is some sort of RS out there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Albasco.com

Hi, I had added an article about Albasco.com company, an Iranian online shop. Unfortunately this article is deleted. I request for an opportunity to edit the content of that article and remove the mistakes including too many links to the company's itself that makes these misunderstandings that is an advertising or copyright infringement. I will deeply grateful if it is possible to undelete Albasco.com content. -Barish.oxtay (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Barish.oxtay (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Barish.oxtay

  • The article was deleted at AfD in 2010, so it has that going against it as well. I'm also concerned that the article was written in a fairly promotional manner. Sentences such as " Albasco.com is trying to introduce online shopping to Iranian people as an easy and reliable tool to purchase a variety of goods with appropriate and reasonable costs and prices" comes across as an advertisement. What I recommend is that you try creating a new version of the article at WP:AfC, our articles for creation page. It won't be in our mainspace, but you would be able to work on creating a new version of the article and you'd have more time to work on it as well. We usually only speedy AfC articles if they are abandoned (6+ months without edits to the page) or violate our guidelines so severely that it cannot remain in the article space, which is usually pretty rare. (The types that do this are usually very extreme promotional articles, threats, copyright violations, and so on.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • On a side note, coverage does not have to be in English. Even if it is in say, a foreign language newspaper, that would still count towards notability. A good place to start for looking for sources would be Wikipedia:WikiProject Iran. Since most of the coverage would be in a foreign language, it would be best if you were to have someone who speaks/reads the language look over the sources and help show you the best places to look for coverage. You could get help at WP:RS/N, a noticeboard for reliable sources, but I have a feeling that you would inevitably be steered towards the Iran wikiproject because of the language barrier. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Montgomeryshire Society

I, Montgomeryshire, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Montgomeryshire (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Monty845 15:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

AFC Mansfield

Club is now a notable one as has won promotion to the Northern Counties East League -Kivo (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. We likewise will not restore G4s as those are dependent on an existing XfD debate. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Rathnam (3rd request)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Robypop2014 (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC) "I found 'Thomas Rathnam" article is genuine one.

Please update it and re host it."

and past those article...

You have been told multiple times, Praisewinner, that we will not restore it and why we will not restore it. Repeatedly asking for it after having been told no repeatedly is disruption and it will get your sock and main accounts blocked. Please stop. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_144&oldid=618751695"