User contributions for 63.143.196.107

15 January 2017

• 13:4313:43, 15 January 2017 diff hist +424 User talk:JFG →"Near native level of English"! GOOD ONE. I nearly died laughing. Trust me, a native can spot you a mile away.: new section
• 13:3313:33, 15 January 2017 diff hist −2 User talk:JFG Undid revision 760185432 by JFG (talk)
• 13:3113:31, 15 January 2017 diff hist +283 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingshowman No edit summary
• 13:2713:27, 15 January 2017 diff hist +302 User talk:JFG →Do you lack basic English fluency and literacy, or is this an issue of a lack of cognitive capacity? You might be the most obtuse editor I have ever encountered: new section
• 13:2413:24, 15 January 2017 diff hist +366 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingshowman Can you read? You might be the single dumbest user I have encountered on Wikipedia
• 13:1013:10, 15 January 2017 diff hist +1 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingshowman Fix formatting
• 13:0913:09, 15 January 2017 diff hist +442 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingshowman Gasp
• 13:0013:00, 15 January 2017 diff hist +623 User talk:Lemongirl942 Thanks. →How do I challenge this decision? Both the admin and the user need to be punished. That page was under 1rr and I documented 4 reverts, and admin just writes "no violation" without comment. I am refiling too
• 12:5412:54, 15 January 2017 diff hist +546 User talk:Lemongirl942 →How do I challenge this decision? Both the admin and the user need to be punished. That page was under 1rr and I documented 4 reverts, and admin just writes "no violation" without comment. I am refiling too
• 12:4912:49, 15 January 2017 diff hist +2,037 User talk:Lemongirl942 →How do I challenge this decision? Both the admin and the user need to be punished. That page was under 1rr and I documented 4 reverts, and admin just writes "no violation" without comment. I am refiling too
• 12:3712:37, 15 January 2017 diff hist +594 User talk:Lemongirl942 →How do I challenge this decision? Both the admin and the user need to be punished. That page was under 1rr and I documented 4 reverts, and admin just writes "no violation" without comment. I am refiling too: new section

26 November 2016

• 01:4101:41, 26 November 2016 diff hist +39 Pain tweak uninformative sentence
• 01:3501:35, 26 November 2016 diff hist −2 Pain move around sentence to a paragraph grouping which more logically reflect content: para 2 is about the function of pain, para 3 is about the treatment of pain, thus explaining the move of 1 sentence I have made.
• 01:3001:30, 26 November 2016 diff hist +2 Pain split paragraph
• 01:3001:30, 26 November 2016 diff hist +507 Pain add info on congenital insensitivity to pain
• 01:2001:20, 26 November 2016 diff hist +54 User talk:63.143.196.107 replies to my critics, both human and machine
• 01:1801:18, 26 November 2016 diff hist +1,026 Pain Fixed grammar, ignoring non-intelligent robot
• 01:1701:17, 26 November 2016 diff hist +3 Pain tweak
• 01:1601:16, 26 November 2016 diff hist +1,025 Pain refs
• 01:0501:05, 26 November 2016 diff hist +503 Pain improvement
• 01:0001:00, 26 November 2016 diff hist +332 Pain add much-needed context to this dry as dust article