User contributions for Peacemaker67

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

13:4513:45, 12 November 2024 diff hist −45 Siege of Smoluća rm tag, as I have rm the citations to incomplete sources
13:4513:45, 12 November 2024 diff hist +932 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Smoluća (2nd nomination) →Siege of Smoluća: comment current
13:3913:39, 12 November 2024 diff hist +416 Siege of Smoluća →Siege: added previous info
13:3613:36, 12 November 2024 diff hist −257 Siege of Smoluća trimmed infobox, no long citation provided for this citation, so unable to verify it and the force strengths, no mention of HVO in the sources
13:3513:35, 12 November 2024 diff hist −1,659 Siege of Smoluća rewrote lead to summarise the article
13:2013:20, 12 November 2024 diff hist −334 Siege of Smoluća →Order of battle: rewrote this section to reflect what is actually in the two additional sources (same book, different chapters. The material purportedly from ''Serbian Studies'' is definitely not supported by the cited page (p. 255)
12:5212:52, 12 November 2024 diff hist +47 Siege of Smoluća →Background: number besieged
11:4311:43, 12 November 2024 diff hist +17 Siege of Smoluća →Order of battle: ref name
11:4211:42, 12 November 2024 diff hist −15 Siege of Smoluća →Background: added ref
11:4011:40, 12 November 2024 diff hist +12 Siege of Smoluća →Order of battle: ref name
11:2911:29, 12 November 2024 diff hist +151 Aloysius Stepinac Reverted good faith edits by Mudroslov (talk): How is that biased? It is a statement of fact. current Tags: Twinkle Undo
11:2711:27, 12 November 2024 diff hist +599 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Yugoslav torpedo boat T6/archive1 →Comments by Dudley: all done I reckon current
11:2511:25, 12 November 2024 diff hist +326 Yugoslav torpedo boat T6 →References: added T 2001 current
11:2411:24, 12 November 2024 diff hist +104 Yugoslav torpedo boat T6 →World War II: add as suggested at FAC Tag: harv-error
11:1411:14, 12 November 2024 diff hist +185 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Yugoslav torpedo boat T6/archive1 →Comments by Dudley: response
11:1111:11, 12 November 2024 diff hist −2 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Yugoslav torpedo boat T6/archive1 →Source review: rm br
11:1111:11, 12 November 2024 diff hist +671 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Yugoslav torpedo boat T6/archive1 →Source review: response, ISBN fixed
11:0911:09, 12 November 2024 diff hist 0 Yugoslav torpedo boat T6 →References: fixed ISBN

21:3221:32, 11 November 2024 diff hist −10 Siege of Smoluća this is clearly wrong. If they had no water they would have been dead in three to seven days. It is also uncited. It is also unlikely that they had no food at all, which this implies. Rural villages in Bosnia had gardens, farms, livestock etc. Food was likely very limited, but there must have been some.
21:2221:22, 11 November 2024 diff hist +130 User talk:Peacemaker67 →TFA: cheers current
08:5708:57, 11 November 2024 diff hist −101 Siege of Smoluća Undid revision 1256632856 by Red Spino (talk) please provide a reliable source for this exact result (tactical victory). Tag: Undo
06:5906:59, 11 November 2024 diff hist −1,893 Chetniks Restored revision 1255980364 by Monkbot (talk): Ah. no. Discuss on the talk page thanks. current Tags: Twinkle Undo