Talk:99th Infantry Battalion (United States)

Military history: North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Untitled

The CorenSearchBot was in error when it question copyright material . The url provided in the error message had very little to do with this article. This is a translated version from the Norwegian Wikipedia article on this subject translated to English. Some grammar changes had to be made to fit the English language. I don't think one can say that a translation of a Norwegian page to the English language can be regarded as a breach of copyright. There was no previous page on this specific battalion in English Wikipedia. Mortyman (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It looks as if you and the website both used Google to translate the content of the Norsk bokmål page, and so I may have been wrong to remove those bits. Please feel free to restore the content I have removed, but preferably in your own words (and in grammatical English); and, of course, with reliable sources and footnotes to support it. Please also be sure to place a {{translated page}} template on this page to provide attribution for the content. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:51, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The final 2 sentences of the "crew" section require attention. I was attempting to decipher the sentences' intended meaning so that I could edit them for clarity. However, upon reading this talk page I learned that the article is a translation from Norwegian. Accordingly, I feel this editing is best left to someone who can read the original article. Is there a way to flag an article as requiring attention from a foreign language speaker? — Preceding unsigned comment added by New Palabras (talk • contribs) 23:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 99th Infantry Battalion (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003195400/http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/pas/66.2/szymczak.html to http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/pas/66.2/szymczak.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]