Talk:Absolute threshold

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2020 and 25 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 17Awesome17.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Sensory threshold to Absolute threshold

These concepts appear to be similar enough to justify merging into one single article. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:58, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Absolute threshold is just a type of sensory threshold. A concept should not be merged to its subconcept. Even if they should be merged, then Absolute threshold should be merged to Sensory threshold, not vice versa. And the content of the two articles are not similar. I don't think they should be merged.--Neo-Jay (talk) 21:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing unsalvageable material

I'm going to delete this material on the grounds that it can't be fixed. It contains a great number of factual errors.

Threshold cannot be determined on perfect sensation or lack thereof, due to fluctuations in the threshold. Thus, there is no set brightness seen by the viewer, and no intensity just lower than this that no flash is seen. To activate a bipolar, multiple rods must be stimulated, e.g., as 1940’s experiments have determined, that eleven quanta, one for each single rod, is necessary to trigger light perception. Another experiment shows that a 60 percent frequency may represent 2,500 quanta, one per rod, among a patch of 2 million rods. Therefore only one rod out of many is perceived at the threshold, and in a short stimulus, rods cannot absorb more than a single photon of light. (A quantum or photon is stated as Planck's constant and the frequency of light.[7])

02:43, 29 October 2008‎ Nuvitauy07

Fluctuations in retinal response are driven by fluctuations of the amount of energy of the stimulus and not the change of retinal sensitivity. For example, if an average number of photons is given, the actual quantum content received and frequency of vision are similar.[7]

01:17, 19 October 2008‎ 68.37.98.204

Zyxwv99 (talk) 03:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tag should come down?

I think the article is now in good enough shape that it doesn't need the expert tag at the top. Zyxwv99 (talk) 23:54, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Five days have gone by and there have been no replies. I'm going to remove the expert tag. If someone still has issues, feel free to discuss them here. We can always put it back if, or use lower-level tags as needed. Zyxwv99 (talk) 13:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]