Talk:Arch of Galerius and Rotunda

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arch of Galerius and Rotunda article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Greece C‑class Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Split in two?

Surely this article should be split into two separate ones? These are two separate monuments... - PocklingtonDan 11:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly it could. They are very close togther, they are both linked to Galerius and I visited them at the same time, so it seemed logical to write about them together. But I don't object to the article being split. Adam 11:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd wait until there's enough material in both to warrant a split that won't result in 2 stubs. --Mcginnly | Natter 10:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These are closely related in earlier scholarship and are integral elements of the Galerius Complex in Thessaloniki, so I do not see a problem with them remaining together. I added a note for the Palace, which might profitably have its own section under a Galerius Arch, Palace, and Rotunda article or some such.--Nefasdicere 03:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is enough information for two articles - separate objects, totally different purposes. I think there should be an article "Complex of Galerius" if you'd like to put everything together.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 10:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Split in two articles and then create a separate article/list "Complex of Galerius" linking to the two articles. The "History" section of the current article can be added to the "complex" article while each monument will feature its own history section TynoPk (talk) 11:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rotunda was a temple

Although the guidebooks still repeat the idea that this was meant to be a tomb, the current scholarly opinion is that it was a temple (god uncertain). I will add some biblio later this week for both monuments. It would be good to rewrite the intro and Rotunda section to reflect current thinking, while preserving reference to the earlier ideas. I will do this unless there are major objections.--Nefasdicere 03:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rotunda in Bulgaria

The page Rotunda of St. George redirects here. But there's also a Rotunda by the same name in Sofia, also built in the 4th century. Zero76 03:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Would it be sensible to rename this article the Arch and Rotunda of Galerius? The current word order is a bit off putting. ^davidiad _.: 02:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arch of Galerius and Rotunda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070820000052/http://odysseus.culture.gr:80/h/2/eh251.jsp?obj_id=1812 to http://odysseus.culture.gr/h/2/eh251.jsp?obj_id=1812

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Classification

This article is currently assessed as B-class. There are some sourcing problems, as well as outdated material, that creates an issue with the WP:B-class criteria #1 and possibly # 2 and/or #4.

Categories:

Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2004
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2010
Articles with unsourced statements from January 2018 -- Otr500 (talk) 21:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saint George Date?

When was this officially, or unofficially, dedicated to Saint George? 130.0.28.7 (talk) 10:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]