Talk:Bob Spink

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Bob Spink is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia: Essex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Essex task force.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of POV and OR interpretation

I have just removed a paragraph which was added to the article based on a Daily Mail story from 27 Nov 2006 (see it here). While it is probably all right to refer to this issue here, the way in which it was done was biased and involved an interpretation of the Mail source that can only be described as original research, and not very accurate original research at that. Among several examples of misrepresentation are:

"the proven fact that a far higher proportion of the UK's black residents are dealt with by the criminal justice system than are whites" (not in source)
"because a far higher proportion of blacks are criminals in comparison to whites" (not in source)
"He stated that in order to tackle crime effectively, the authorities need to accept the truth about the demographics of the active criminal population." (not in source) (He actually said "The main parties have to address where the crime is coming from..."
"This was in line with speeches on the subject of mugging that were given by Sir Paul Condon in 1995, and by Sir Ian Blair in 2002" (not in source)

Incidentally, the source does say that he "refused to confirm or deny the contents of the emails" and that "he 'deplored' racism", quoting him directly as "I completely deplore racism of any kind." Emeraude (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In UKIP or not?

I dont know whether this has come about because of the lack of a whip or whether he has left the party, or if he never joined it...

http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2009/04/has-bob-spink-left-ukip.html --LeedsKing (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Spink now claims that he was never a member of UKIP: [1].

This is however not what he told BBC News [2] or the House of Commons [3] [4] in April 2008.

He was redesignated as an independent MP in November, claiming that "I remain an enthusiastic UKIP member and supporter, but UKIP have never had a whip at Westminster and I have been acting, effectively, as an Independent in the house... In short, I remain 'UKIP's MP', but I am independent of any Party Political Whip, as I have stressed many times." This was announced on UKIP's website [5].

In an interview in December he said "Even though I am Independent, since I refuse to take a party political whip in the House, I am an enthusiastic and totally committed UKIP member." [6] ^Tom _Phil 10:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why he left UKIP

7th Nov 2012 - removed a null reference to the ukip.org website with regards the issue of the whip. Need a reliable news source stating why he stood down 31.51.182.78 (talk) 16:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Occupation

It says his occupation is Member of Parliament but he lost his seat in 2010. Please rectify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.194.253 (talk) 13:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bob Spink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]