Talk:Cai Lun

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cai Lun article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

Cai Lun is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 4, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 3, 2020	Peer review	Reviewed
September 28, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
June 10, 2021	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
July 17, 2021	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia / Core

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is listed on the project's core biographies page.

Body Modification (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Body Modification, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Body ModificationWikipedia:WikiProject Body ModificationTemplate:WikiProject Body ModificationBody Modification articles

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Invention High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Top‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Confusing and poor representations of appearance

I believe the portrait of Emperor Zhang on this page is unnecessary and confusing; a casual viewer could easily (as I did initially) mistake the portrait for one of Cai Lun, especially considering the similarity in appearance to the central figure in the image of “Patron Saint Cai Lun.” In fact, all of the images on the page must be incorrect, as they portray Cai with a beard, and as a eunuch he wouldn’t have had one. This is evident in the majority of recent representations, for example https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hunan_International_Economics_University23.jpg, his statue at Cai Lun Memorial Hall in Leiyang, and the official postage stamp of 1962: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cai_Lun_New.jpg. Any one of these would be more appropriate than the images currently used on this page. UnbrokenMonkey (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since all portrayals are inherently totally fictional, I don't see why using beardedness should be a deciding criteria. Remsense诉 22:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, and such a rationale is essentially WP:OR. Both images the OP links are not in public domain; the stamp will not be until 2057, and the Statue is not due to commons:Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/China#Freedom_of_panorama. For the record, both images were used in the article until these issues were discovered during FAC.

The current image is a commonly used representation of Cai by modern sources, reproduced in Tsien 1985, Hunter & Hunter 1978 and Hart 2000. Aza24 (talk) 01:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about this more, I've removed the portrait of emperor Zhang. It doesn't really add anything, and I can agree that no one reads image captions. Aza24 (talk) 05:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

@Aza24 The point I was trying to make was that a lot of the {{ill}} links weren't pointing to the proper English Wikipedia link. For example, {{ill|延笃|zh|lt=Yan Du}} points to the English Wikipedia article 延笃, not Yan Du. I just changed it {{ill|Yan Du|zh|延笃}}, which points to Yan Du.

Also the Dongguan Hanji was not compiled by Yan Du like you put in the bibliography, it was progressively expanded by many different people throughout the Eastern Han. Kzyx (talk) 03:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, I've now restored most of your edits. Sorry for the confusion; in the future, a more detailed edit summary would be helpful. Usually when I see mass, unexplained changes to featured articles like this, its hard to vet them thoroughly. Aza24 (talk) 04:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]