Talk:Champions Classic

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Only one team unranked

@Rockchalk717: I agree that it's relevant to state all 4 teams have been ranked every time except once, and I don't have a problem with identifying that is was MSU in 2011. It demonstrates the strength of all 4 basketball programs and the prominence of this particular game series. @207.237.210.114: can you please elaborate on why you feel this statement is irrelevant or insulting? I assumed you didn't like identifying the sole unranked team, and thought it might bolster their reputation by pointing out they finished the 2011 season ranked 5th (which goes further to demonstrate the importance of all 4 teams). Hoof Hearted (talk) 14:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoof Hearted: I don’t mean this in mean way but honestly I really think their only objection to it is they are a Michigan State fan. I’m not holding my breath they’ll discuss this either. IPs rarely want to discuss their edit disputes. But you saying this will help if this ip chooses not comment.--Rockchalk7 17 14:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed again - I'm assuming good faith. I'm not sure what the harm is in pointing out they finished 5th that season. I saw that as complementary to MSU if anyone felt they were being singled out, and as I said above, goes to further demonstrate the series caliber (the one time a team was unranked for this game series, they went on to finish ranked - so they were still a good team) Hoof Hearted (talk) 14:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the flip side though, you could make a case for saying Kansas who played last year as the number one team in the country, finished with 10 losses and 17th in the nation. I think it would open up the door for so much more stuff being added into the opening that truly isn’t necessary.--Rockchalk7 17 18:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Hoof Hearted (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Head to head.

Duke is 2-2 vs Kentucky, not 1-3 2601:486:280:3C00:8821:B30E:316A:AF41 (talk) 05:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Duke is actually 3–1 vs Kentucky, as shown in the head-to-head table. Duke beat Kentucky in 2012, 2018, 2021 and lost to them in 2015. Hoof Hearted (talk) 19:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]