Talk:Daylight saving time in Brazil

Brazil: Government and laws Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Time Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Postponement of the end of DST

The article currently has "Near-past and near-future years in which the end of DST is scheduled to be postponed are 2012, 2015, 2023, 2026, 2034 and 2037, for which the pattern is +3 +8."

The postponement is linked to the date of Easter Sunday (see Computus), which suggests that at least the long-term pattern should be more complex than an 11-year cycle. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Code in http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-date5.htm#SLGD - agrees with the years stated above, but that is the maximum length of the current "+3 +8" pattern. For years 2000 to 2123, the current (2014-02-23) rule gives postponements in the years 2007 2012 2015 2023 2026 2034 2037 2039 2042 2045 2048 2050 2053 2061 2064 2066 2072 2075 2077 2080 2091 2102 2105 2107 2110 2118 2121. The full pattern must repeat every 5,700,000 years, and might not repeat sooner. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]