Talk:Deafness in Thailand

Deaf Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Deafness in Thailand is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Thailand Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About the missing Lead section

This article is part of a WikiEdu project that is currently in progress. The Lead section will be added within a few weeks. Matthall.research (talk) 21:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Language Emergence section

No significant improvement since initial submission: score remains 2.5/3 Matthall.research (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Significant Organizations section

Nice improvement here, although it's still not clear which of these are Deaf-led. Score: 2.75/3 Matthall.research (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Human/Civil Rights section

No meaningful improvement: score remains 2/3. Matthall.research (talk) 23:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primary & Secondary Education

Generally good content, but the final paragraph still lacks citations, which prevents me from giving this a higher score than 2/3. Matthall.research (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Employment

This section is great! Clearly organized, well-cited, providing both big-picture context and relevant details. Excellent work! Score: 3/3 Matthall.research (talk) 00:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Healthcare

The content you present here focuses on hearing technologies, as if you view deafness as the primary threat to DHH people's health. That's quite disconcerting to see at this point in the course! The goal of this section is to report on how DHH people manage to keep their whole selves (mind and body) healthy: how do they develop health literacy, communicate with healthcare providers, access information from public health authorities, etc. I'm afraid I can't give this anything higher than a 1/3. Matthall.research (talk) 00:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]