Talk:Fast-ion conductor

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Untitled

As I recall NaCl has a measurable but low conductivity- but surely it is too low to qualify as a fast ion conductor. What are the numbers?--Axiosaurus (talk) 16:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed NaCl from list of examples as it is not a fast ion conductor. May remove others later, because i don't think they should be included if only conducting at higher temperatures. Red Vengeance (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove examples simply because they are only fast ion conductors at high temperature - the temperature at which they perform does not change the fact that they are fast ion conductors at that temperature! Polyamorph (talk) 07:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Superionic conductors

"Unlike conventional solid electrolytes and superionic conductors." is not a sentence and doesn't make sense.

Moreover, shouldn't the referenced article in the fourth paragraph have a number rather than an asterisk? And shouldn't it be under References?

Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Solid electrolyes" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Solid electrolyes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 31#Solid electrolyes until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. rayukk | talk 10:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]