Talk:Frequency divider

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How to make a divider using the smallest number of transistors? On a SiGe BiCMOS process, you have to run a npn transistor at a high current to get the frequency response of which the process is capable. So I need to minimize the number of transistors to minimize the power dissipation. Also, the process uses Vcc=2.5volt max, another feature of your typical SiGe process, so there's another limitation of the number of transistors stacked.

Talk

Citation Needed, Regenerative frequency divider

"... the amplifier gain at the half frequency must be greater than unity. The phase shift must also be an integer multiple of 2pi." should probably be suppressed.

If you are trying to make a oscillator out of a linear amplifier then, at the frequency of oscillation, the loop gain must be greater than unity and the phase must be an integer multiple of 2pi. In fact, the oscillator finds the frequency at which the phase is a multiple of 2pi. If you adjust the components, the frequency changes. If you want some particular precise frequency you have to adjust the components very carefully. The Regenerative frequency divider is a highly non-linear circuit. Phase in the sense of the linear amplifier doesn't mean anything. You don't have to carefully tune the filter. You can vary the filter and as long as you don't vary it too much, the output frequency won't change. The filter is usually a band pass filter.Constant314 (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing this unsourced material. The citation request has been on the material over a year.Constant314 (talk) 03:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frequency divider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070825195525/http://www.electronicproducts.com/ShowPage.asp?SECTION=3700&PRIMID=&FileName=FEBCON1.FEB2001 to http://www.electronicproducts.com/ShowPage.asp?SECTION=3700&PRIMID=&FileName=FEBCON1.FEB2001

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]