Talk:Glacial buzzsaw

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glaciers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discarded?

What does the word "discarded" mean or refer to in this sentence: "Some of the mountain massifs experiencing the highest uplift rates are those for which glacial buzzsaw effects are discarded." This needs clarification. Does it mean buzzsaw effects don't happen in these areas? Or that the researchers who argue for buzzsaw effects don't take these areas into consideration during their theorizing? -- Dough34 (talk) 22:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]