This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that eight thousand giant sequoias were cut down in the world's most destructive lumbering event? Source: Zimmerman, Robert (Fall 1998). "Log Flume". American Heritage's Invention and Technology. American Heritage. Retrieved December 23, 2022.
Hi Guywelch2000 (talk), unfortunately I don't think the 5x expansion in prose criteria has been met. I'm measuring it at about 17,400 characters at the moment (quotes, captions and lists don't count) and about 8,250 in this version of 25 November. It's already quite a long article and I don't think 5x expansion is achievable. Tour best bet for a DYK appearance is probably to get it accepted as a WP:Good Article. All the best - Dumelow (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Guywelch2000 (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2022 (UTC) Thanks for your review of the submission and thoughtful response. You're right. Even though the page was expanded considerably it falls short of the 5x threshold. And there's not much left to say on the subject that would extend the page's length. I appreciate your feedback as a relatively new and learning Wikipedia contributor.[reply]
Hi Guywelch2000 (talk), unfortunately I don't think the 5x expansion in prose criteria has been met. I'm measuring it at about 17,400 characters at the moment (quotes, captions and lists don't count) and about 8,250 in this version of 25 November. It's already quite a long article and I don't think 5x expansion is achievable. Tour best bet for a DYK appearance is probably to get it accepted as a WP:Good Article. All the best - Dumelow (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Guywelch2000 (talk), no problem this nomination should be automatically archived shortly. I would really consider taking the article to Wikipedia:Good article nominations, it looks pretty decent - Dumelow (talk) 06:41, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
