Jump to content

Talk:Jake and Amir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jake and Amir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of HeadGum into this article

[edit]

I'm not convinced HeadGum is independently notable of Jake and Amir at this time. The only source is a one paragraph blurb and a list of podcasts. If it's okay with people here, I'll go ahead and merge HeadGum into Jake and Amir. – by AdA&D at 19:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just going to go ahead and do it. If people think it was a bad move we can have a discussion about it. – by AdA&D at 02:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Anne drew Andrew and Drew, I appreciate you being WP:BOLD. I personally disagree with the changes, but perhaps I will try to improve the article in my sandbox before bringing the subject back up. Bkissin (talk) 22:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Bkissin, feel free to revert the HeadGum article to this version if you'd don't agree with the merge. I don't feel strongly either way. Thanks, AdA&D 16:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]