This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
There appear to a number of inconsistencies in the two references used as a basis for the list.
Gateway Center comprises four towers built in early '70s and mid '80s, but are not clearly define therein or this Wiki list. Fireman's Insurance Company Building is listed as building at corner of Broad and Market, which are not one and the same, though they may have had same name. Addtionally there would appear to be other buildings that do not appear on ref listings at all, NJT Headquarters among them. Appears a bit of field research is necessary and for the references themselves to be updated/corrected Djflem (talk) 13:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Based on available references and the building’s own website: NEARLY 400 feet. Provide references for anything different. Do not change/revert without them.
So I got the correct information from a friend who worked on the construction of the tower. If you open the link below you can view it. This is 777 McCarter Highway. Ground floor is at an elevation of 21, the highest point of the building is at 390. 390-21= 369. If the author of the Wikipedia page could put down the correct information that'd be great.
Unfortunately the images used have been “lifted” from developers websites and other sources, despite the claim that the ‘own work’ of the downloader. They are not and therefore violate both Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia copyright rules and are not legally usable without permission of person/agency that originally made them (or whomever holds copyright. Just the way it is at Wikimedia Commons. 18:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC) Djflem (talk) 18:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It cannot be possible that Halo 2 and 3 are between 133 and 165 feet taller Halo 1 See renderings and information. Numbers provided were not reliable. Other sources vary and are inconsistent:
Are the images of the current site necessary for buildings in this category? I cannot think of a single other "List of tallest buildings" page that includes the picture of the current site for uncompleted buildings. Looking at some of the images, most of them aren't even useful, they are either too broad of an image, too narrow, or simply useless. I think they should be removed, and I will do so, but if you think they should remain please discuss here. Hij802 (talk) 04:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That they don't exist on other pages is not really relevant. And why would location be informative? Granted, some are more so than others. What do you mean too broad or too narrow? Djflem (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Almost all of the images are pretty useless and uninformative.
The Halo Tower 2 and 3 are just pictures of the construction of Halo Tower 1.
yes, tower 1 & side of site where tower 2 & tower 3 may be built
The Arc Tower photo is just a photo of Washington Square Park, the 571 Broad Street address isn't even in the picture.
not ideal, but very much the section & context of Broad Street side (next to florist)
The Summit Tower photo is a general photo of the street it's on, the actual site just blends in with everything else on the right.
shows location & context in historic district where it may be built, very relevant considering historic commission/city planning department decisions
96 Clay Street isn't even in view.
not great, but intersection of Clay Street & approach to bridge
CitiSquare's photo only shows the small part of the site, not the main original field.
the location shows site of Lincoln Motel which is large part of the site, and context near train line
Nova Towers photo is just a skyline photo.
shows parking lot & relationship to Government Center location
Artside is just a photo of a light rail station.
shows key feature of future developent
Based on this, only 2 out of the 10 photos under these categories are actually useful. That's pretty bad. Now, I could easily just screenshot street view photos from Google Maps to replace all of these, but overall I just do not think these photos are necessary to have. I think they should either be removed, or at least replaced with useful ones. Hij802 (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Useful fotos give context and demonstrate existing situation and how development will change landscape. Article are a historical survey of tallest buildings AND skyline and urban development and architectural works found in the city, all informative (and of interest to architects, historians, urban planners, visitors, locals, etc, etc) Some could be upgraded, but that is a process.Djflem (talk) 11:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
Done -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
