Talk:Media in Alberta

Canada: Alberta Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Concentration and political leanings

The Concentration and political leanings section of this page is going to need a lot of third party sources to get away from original research and bias. A section like this should just not exist. 117Avenue (talk) 03:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This has the appearance of soapboxing dissatisfaction over the recent election news coverage by party. This section should be balanced if retained. Hwy43 (talk) 05:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added the report from the foundation (name escapes me), simply because I was fascinated that someone had studied this and I had never read anything about it before. But this is simply a starting point. I hope there are other secondary sources that can shed more light on the issue. Please add them as you find them, but please do not remove what was posted originally unless there is clear consensus reason to do so. It is the base from which we can expand. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 22:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus thus far appears to be to remove the content. It is bizarre that a generalize article has been created for the purpose of sharing this foundation's observation. This micro-level observation sticks out in an article that should be mainly a macro-level summary of media in Alberta. Hwy43 (talk) 05:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Media in Alberta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]