Talk:Micropub (protocol)

Please do not remove encyclopedic information

A recent edit removed encyclopedic information about implementations of Micropub with summary "primary source", that's insufficient reason. If an editor believes more sources/citations are necessary then use the respective template to indicate that to *improve* the page, rather than deleting informative encyclopedic content. I reverted this deletionism accordingly. Tantek (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:PRIMARY. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 23:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove longstanding references

A recent edit removed a unique reference to a credible source (W3C blog) with a summary of "already says recommendation". A content reason is not a good reason to remove a citation. I reverted this removal of a credible source accordingly. Tantek (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source is duplicative, and I'm not sure what you mean by "A content reason is not a good reason to remove a citation" or what policy such a statement is based on. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 23:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]