Talk:Moseley and Kings Heath (ward)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Requested move
[edit]Moseley and Kings Heath Ward → Moseley and Kings Heath – To reflect the standard formatting for Birmingham city wards; target page was previously incorrect redirect DWaterson 23:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Support - I proposed this move, so I'd better vote myself. The title of the page should reflect the name of the ward, as with Lozells and East Handsworth and Stechford and Yardley North, for example; the word "Ward" on the end is redundant. DWaterson 23:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Moseley and Kings Heath (ward). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130421014718/http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lmp/ward/1308627807/report.aspx to http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lmp/ward/1308627807/report.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)