Jump to content

Talk:Ormside bowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Ormside bowl covers content related to York Museums Trust. This organisation has participated in a GLAMwiki project. You may find interesting content related to the topic among their Archaeological collections of the Yorkshire Museum images or items or be find out more about them or from their staff at their GLAM Directory Page. They are keen to help through this and their participation in the global GLAMwiki Project



Untitled

[edit]

'an lost early eighth century hanging-bowl from the River Witham.". Found in the River Witham, no doubt. How can a reader identify the object that is mentioned in this way?--Wetman (talk) 00:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With some difficulty. It is mentioned in Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde without any more detail but is also in these 1, 2. The Society of Antiquaries has an article on their website called 'New Interpretation of the Witham Bowl and its Animal Imagery' but a login is required to access it, and there are also some journal articles I don't have access to. JMiall₰ 01:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from British Museum curator

[edit]

The following is feedback from Barry Ager:

The suggestion in the article that the bowl was found in a Viking grave goes rather further than the evidence allows. There was a Viking burial found at Ormside, but, although the bowl is from the same site, little is known about the circumstances of its discovery and its precise findspot and context are uncertain. It is not impossible that it was found in another grave there, but, as Sir David Wilson has suggested, it may also derive from the church itself. Since Sir David is a leading authority on Late Saxon art and has accepted it as Anglo-Saxon workmanship, I do not think there can be any doubt on that score. I have re-checked ref 1 in the article by David Wilson (in the RGA vol. as quoted) and note that he suggests that the OB was made in the mid-8th century, probably in Northumbria. This dating should be given priority over, or even replace, the earlier one given in the comparisons, which is drawn from a very out-dated article.

Witty Lama 09:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I won't have a chance to change anything this weekend but will sort it out next week if nobody else does first.JMiall₰ 17:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ormside bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ormside_bowl&oldid=1209542751"