Talk:P-500 Bazalt

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

dear mr.clark

you would have evan tar in your 5 period class for 3 months tell we skip him up to a higher math grade so he gonna be on your roster on tuesday so thanks for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.145.186.145 (talk) 00:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

needed

the most needed thing is the weight of the missile and launch system —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.127.244 (talk) 01:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The start weight is 4800kg (10580lbs). The next generation of the same missile was P-1000 Vulcan. Main characteristics are the same except the maximum range was increased up to 700km (378 nautical miles/435 miles). The missiles were interchangeable so there was a refitting program to replace older P-500 with newer P-1000. I know for sure only two ship that was equipped with the P-1000 - it is "Moskva" missile cruiser and "Varyag" missile cruiser. Link: http://www.cruiser-moskva.info/arms/p1000.htm The English version of the same site incorrectly says that the P-500 was still in use on that ship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.204.86.210 (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket?

It looks like an airbreather from the side view shown. 500 miles is a long way for a rocket is it not? Ramjet? 82.43.234.228 (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image vertically flipped?

The image at the start of the article looks upside down, with the flight deck to the starboard side of the ship instead of port. Anyone clear this up? Am I mistaken? Does it matter? --Stickie 86.167.59.130 (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image of the Russian Moskva naval ship near the Golden Gate Bridge, California, USA appears to be a composite. This is not an acceptable practice.

Can someone verify this image is a composite digitized image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AZ360BLUE (talk • contribs) 03:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]