Talk:P wave

Earthquakes High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Need link

There should be a link to P-wave_modulus. Armando Serrano 11:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now there is. --Berland 17:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pressure wave

Pressure wave currently redirects here. It may be a vernacular term in physics contexts, but, if applicable, the term should be addressed for the benefit of the general Wikipedia reader. ENeville (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Polarization of P-waves

"In isotropic and homogeneous solids, the polarization of a P-wave is always longitudinal". Shouldn't this say "mode of propagation" instead of "polarization"? Longitudinal waves don't have a polarization, because the direction of oscillation is always the same as the direction of travel of the wave (the article on polarization says this too). Sanchonx (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the discussion of "polarization" and revised the (unsourced) statement in the article summary with language about the mode of propagation. Ketone16 (talk) 14:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shadow Zone

The shadow zone of a P wave is between 105 and 143 degrees.

W. Lowrie, Fundamentals of Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. P 149.

Quiksilver4Eyes (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seismology

Are P-waves specific to seismology? The intro does not explicitly include such a qualifier and indicates that P-waves can be found in liquids and gasses. If they are this general, I might propose merging Mechanical wave into this article. If not, I'd add some qualifiers to the lead. --Kvng (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative definitions

I would like to see some mention of the alternative nomenclature that features in a wide range of physics and acoustics textbooks. Namely, that P stands for parallel polarization (i.e., in-plane polarization), S stands for senkrecht (German for 'normal' or 'perpendicular') which is out-of-plane polarization, and L stands for longitudinal. In contrast, it appears that in seismology, P stands for parallel which refers to purely longitudinal waves, and S stands for shear which refers to all polarization states that are not longitudinal. See for example Polarization_(waves)#s_and_p_designations — Preceding unsigned comment added by MJASmith (talk • contribs) 21:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on P-wave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]