Talk:Rajah & Tann
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
COI tag and cleanup
[edit]I noticed a series of possible COI edits to this article. It needs to be checked for neutrality. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have addressed some of the issues on the page by cleaning up some language, and removing statements that were not supported by citations. FwGdMn (talk) 21:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Still reads like a puff piece. So the graphics with the slogan is prominently displayed by Google.
Clever ad tricks.
Zezen (talk) 03:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Company praised by FT
[edit]Context: the Wirecard fraud investigation. https://www.ft.com/content/79f23db0-260d-11e9-8ce6-5db4543da632
... the suspicions of its lawyers at Rajah & Tann — a top-notch law firm in the region — who had found sufficient evidence to warrant an investigation dubbed “Project Tiger”.
-> let us mention it. Zezen (talk) 03:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)