Jump to content

Talk:St Andrew's Cathedral School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

St Andrew's Cathedral Choir

[edit]

Should the cathedral choir information put under the "St Andrew's Cathedral, Sydney" article, instead of the the Cathedral School article? While choir are mainly educated in the cathedral school, they are actually part of the Cathedral in my opinion.- Kid063 22:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its a good idea. Anyone else got ideas? --groovybill 11:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

No sorry, they are actually part of the school. - Student

I dont think is part of the school, because the Choir actually included adult lay clerks as well - which means some of the choir members are not educated or having musical training in St Andrew's Cathedral School. More importantly, St Andrew's Cathedral Choir exists since 1868 - many years before Bishop Barry founded SACS, therefore I think the choir is part of the Cathedral instead of the School - Kid063 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kid063 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The choir are definitely part of the school - Former Student —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.64.57 (talk) 10:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the choir should be written about in both the article for the Cathedral as well as the school, because even if it would fit better in the cathedral article, the choir is still a major part of the school. - Student —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.1.14 (talk) 06:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Founder

[edit]

The school's founder was Bishop Barry? Not Fr. Joseph Dalton, SJ? --Master Spiky

yes. where does it say that? groovybill 04:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

On one of our buildings... >_> - Student

Les Mis

[edit]

This paragraph is O.T.T. Fewer superlatives would make it reasonable. Anglicant

I fixt it by changing around some of the words and deleting the O.T.T parts - Student

Gawura

[edit]

Why doesn't this page elaborate on criticism faced by Gawura? Specifically its segregationist nature. It seems incredibly POV, written like it was copied and pasted from the schools own website http://www.redwatch.org.au/media/070406smh/ for example 124.179.47.114 (talk) 05:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why should it? Elaborating on what SOME people think is segregationist is POV anyway. Everything listed under the gawura section is plain fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.125.216 (talk) 01:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on St Andrew's Cathedral School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:St_Andrew%27s_Cathedral_School&oldid=1204468392"