Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stephen Miller (political advisor) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4: 180 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Biased description of a character

Since Wikipedia is the encyclopedia of the world, do you think this bio delivers all the perspectives ? 2604:3D08:1282:4500:5D19:81BC:7E33:3364 (talk) 04:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It delivers the noteworthy and notable perspective, yes. We don't give a platform to the fringe. ValarianB (talk) 11:34, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is biased. What you call the fringe is composed of Americans who believe in morality. Wikipedia is not neutral. TideWater11 (talk) 02:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TideWater11, please provide some evidence for your assertion. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's definitely biased. It said he's anti immigration and that's a lie. He's anti illegal immigration! 2600:1700:3551:2800:BC93:F9C0:7BC6:457A (talk) 20:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, also anti-legal immigration.

Stephen Miller: Trump will implement ‘spectacular migration crackdown’

Emails show Stephen Miller pressed hard to limit green cards – Muboshgu (talk) 20:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Immigration

He's anti illegal immigration. Not immigration. 2600:1700:3551:2800:BC93:F9C0:7BC6:457A (talk) 20:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miller is anti all immigration. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit ...

Racist Fox News guest Stephen Miller: “If you import the Third World, you become the Third World"

https://www.mediamatters.org/stephen-miller/fox-news-guest-stephen-miller-if-you-import-third-world-you-become-third-world 76.156.161.247 (talk) 21:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 November 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– A pageview analysis shows that this Miller has received far more views than the other Stephen Millers. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 15:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose A mere page view analysis for a recently active political figure is biased by WP:RECENTISM. No other evidence provided. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miller is not recently active, as his infobox shows. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He's active. Very recently active. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should have clarified, what I'm referring to is that he had roles in Trump's administration and will continue to have those roles. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hence WP:RECENTISM. Is he more important than a former governor of Minnesota or a former governor of South Carolina in the long-term? Or how about the other ten or so? And please don't edit your comments after someone has already responded to it. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clearly the primary topic, the other pages are not nearly as notable. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 19:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above. WP:RECENTISM doesn't apply as he has been a major figure since 2016. Additionally, he is going to be appointed as Deputy Chief of Staff in the White House. The other Stephen Millers are nowhere as notable. Danski14^(talk) 19:26, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is essentially the definition of RECENTISM. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. WP:RECENTISM. Theparties (talk) 19:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per points raised above. The Account 2 (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose WP:RECENTISM. Doug Weller talk 15:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on the WP:RECENTISM grounds cited above, and because of the sheer commonality of the given name, surname, and combination. I would also note that all of these are easily confused with the many names at Steve Miller. BD2412 T 17:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SPLC

Including that someone is listed as an "extremist" by the Southern Poverty Law Center is useless information, akin to noting that they are listed by the John Birch Society as a communist. 128.92.214.163 (talk) 22:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion

Much of this is opinion vs fact 2600:100A:B11A:F9E8:528:C5AA:CA34:80E4 (talk) 22:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. A very slanted article for Wikipedia. The references to what Miller supposedly said in high school are petty and subjective. Lscollison (talk) 17:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How so? This is a biography of his entire life, not just his time in the Trump administrations. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]