Talk:The Amazing Mrs Pritchard

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

It is requested that an image or photograph of The Amazing Mrs Pritchard be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Reception

The following was (rightfully) removed from the article, but can someone who knows do a paragraph about how it was recieved? "but was widely perceived as a critical and ratings disaster. By the end of the shows run it was attracting only three million viewers, a disaster for a mainstream BBC drama. The BBC have confirmed that a proposed second series will not be made." Amo 14:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I collected some quotes about the show after it's first airing. Dunno about ratings, though. Check Media Guardian? I heard they said that it would return ove the end credits, but I imagine they say that about everything. HornetMike 15:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of character articles

Seeing as the BBC shows no indication it will re-comission the series, and thus there's little room for expansion I suggest Ros Pritchard, Catherine Walker and Hilary Rees-Benson be merged into the main article, with a lengthier characters section created. HornetMike 14:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Go for it. Amo 16:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Created the characters page, but it needs more content. Seeing as I watched little of the show, someone else may need to do that. HornetMike 20:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another series?

I emailed the BBC and asked if another series was being made, or going to be made. They said that it hadn't been decided. St91 17:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

If you are a Mrs Pritchard fan, add the userbox! {{User:Billbert12/Userboxes/mrspritchard}}

MrsP	This user says politics isn't rocket science.

Enjoy... Billbert12 (talk) 02:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]