This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Should really be undergrad only. Pretty bizarre to see UChicago represented as a 14,000-strong school when their athletic program more accurately reflects their small UG body. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.246.6 (talk) 21:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is no consensus for this change, which adds some very tangential information about two other conferences. Barring a developing consensus it needs to be removed.--Cúchullaint/c21:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One editor's opinion does not constitute a consensus. Where is the policy that if there are conflicting versions with no consensus, the original version must stand? I am aware that there exists WP:BOLD which might not be policy but it encourages editors to make changes to improve articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.129.220 (talk) 22:59, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In this case your change was not an improvement, and was in fact rejected by multiple editors. WP:BOLD is tempered by the bold, revert, discuss cycle. The burden of evidence is on YOU to defend your change via discussion, and you haven't done this. Additionally, you are engaging in edit warring and will be blocked from editing if you continue.
I have now included a source that says specifically that all of these universities are AAU members and altered the wording somewhat to address your concern. Hopefully that resolves the issue.Cúchullaint/c23:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice try. As you know you were reverted by both myself and Dirtlawyer1, and that's just at this page. Your first step should have been to come to the talk page and discuss it. Do that in the future and these problems can be avoided.--Cúchullaint/c13:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, dirtlawyer1 called my edit "vandalism", which it was not, and since that editor believed he/she was reverting vandalism with their edit it doesn't actually establish any sort of consensus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.129.220 (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
