Talk:Warsaw Uprising (1794)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Warsaw Uprising (1794) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Warsaw Uprising (1794) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 11, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
July 18, 2006	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
August 8, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
August 17, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
October 20, 2009	Featured article review	Demoted
April 4, 2022	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Former featured article

Belarus Mid‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: European / Polish / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Russia: History / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peer review

Okay, I spent quite some time on this article and perhaps it's time to draw more attention to correcting and improving it, so I asked for this article to be peer reviewed. Hopefully this willmake more people work on it. //Halibu tt 07:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I'm happy to announce that my tactics of escape forwards has proven right one more time. This article's been a subject of lots of heated debates in the past. Judging by lack of comments it seems that expansion and sourcing of this article was a step in a good direction :) //Halibu tt 06:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kilinski.jpg

The image Image:Kilinski.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:Warsaw Arsenal 1938.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B-class review

This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 23:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Done :) //Halibu tt 01:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Halibutt: I've added a single cite req. As soon as it is fixed, I'll pass it for B-class, and I encourage you to submit it to WP:GAC. Some citations have the wrird ¶ symbol, please remove it or otherwise format it (I've never seen it discussed in MoS...). No other pre-GA comments, looks good! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Done. The paragraph symbol (or ¶) is precisely what others suggested I use during pre-FAC assessment of the article on Battle of Radzymin (1920). And funny thing, you considered the symbol weird back then too (here) :). Anyway, to quote the relevant article, In academic writing, it is sometimes used as an in-text referencing tool to make reference to a specific paragraph from a document that does not contain page numbers - which is precisely how I used it. If you have alternative suggestions - feel free to state them, but I believe the proper symbol is the way to go. And as we're free to chose whichever referencing system we use as long as we're consistent, I see no problem with that. //Halibu tt 06:52, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Live and learn. Good job - B class it is. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:14, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. On to GA status now and we'll have it back as a FA again in no time :D If only it worked this way these days... (see here). //Halibu tt 20:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Warsaw Uprising (1794). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Warsaw Uprising (1794). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221032905/http://www.wawel.net/malarstwo/norblin.htm to http://www.wawel.net/malarstwo/norblin.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]