Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Mass No. 4 (Schubert)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Mass No. 4 (Schubert)'s DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 22:45, 30 March 2013 (UTC).

Mass No. 4 (Schubert)

[edit]

Created by Riana (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 23:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC).

New: Good. Length: 1700+. Policy: Neutral. AGFing on book souces. Alt 1 Is a good hook, we should probably go with that one. Since this isn't a self-nom it doesn't need a QPQ, does it? Abyssal (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Right, it doesn't need a QPQ, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
  • New enough, long enough, well sourced, no close paraphrasing seen in online sources. Offline hook ref AGF. The original hook is much more interesting from a hook point of view. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC)