Template talk:Parks and gardens in Edinburgh

Red links

@Crowsus: Thanks for adding pages to the template. In line with the Wikipedia guidelines on red links in templates, which I've quoted below, I would really appreciate if you could create as many pages as relevant, even if just as stubs which other users can expand. Otherwise, I'll remove red links in a fortnight or so.

"Red links may be used on navigation templates with links to existing articles, but they cannot be excessive. Editors who add excessive red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or they may be removed from the template." Wikipedia:Red link

CPClegg (talk) 09:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look this weekend, to be honest I added too many and some wouldn't pass as notable. I created Template:Parks and gardens in Glasgow on the back of this, and got carried away there too. I have now sorted that into 'larger' and 'smaller' parks - using only my own judgement to discern, which I appreciate is far from ideal but haven't been able to find anything more useful like a list of park sizes for comparison (and even then, that doesn't signify importance). The smaller group on the Glasgow list have been un-red linked; it would probably be justifiable to remove them altogether but I'll leave that to someone else. I intend to do likewise for Edinburgh, which should make the list tidier, more manageable and less red. Crowsus (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful CPClegg (talk) 21:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]