User:Andrew Mill

Wikipedia:Babel

en

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

AU

This user speaks Australian English.

fr-1

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.

Wikipedia Focus

Unified login: Andrew Mill is the unique unified login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.

My Interests

This user is addicted to travel.

This user has already had a quantum of solace..

This user is interested in motorsports.

SC

This user is a Supercars Championship fan

Aussie, Aussie, Aussie
This user supports the
WALLABIES

FOR

This user supports the Western Force.

Bio

This user comes from Western Australia.

AWST

This user's time zone is AWST.

Y

This user is a member of
Generation Y.

This user is an Information technology professional.

This user is or was a member of Scouts Australia.

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Andrew_Mill.

Inclusionism

I was worried that I might be inventing a word, but Inclusionism appears to be a real term!
I am a new pages patroller. My primary focus for this task is the removal of vandalism and articles that appear blatantly inconsistent with guidelines on notability. I always try to assume good faith and therefore tend to use the Proposed for Deletion process in preference to the more aggressive speedy deletion process.

If I have tagged your article as Proposed for Deletion, you may be surprised that I consider myself an inclusionist. Remember that using the PROD process, articles must tagged as Proposed for Deletion for seven days before deletion occurs, and any editor can halt the process by removing the PROD tag. I acknowledge that my assessment of the notability of an article may not be correct and it is not my approach to further challenge that a particular article should be deleted, once a PROD tag has been removed.

So why do I PROD some new articles? If a new article is very brief and the subject doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines I PROD it mainly to challenge the article's editor(s) to think about whether it really is a notable topic. I understand that new articles take time to develop, but given the timeline involved and the ease of halting the process, I consider the PROD process to be non-aggressive.

I am new to patrolling new pages, and this is just my opinion. I would welcome yours on my talk page.