This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jclemens.
This editor is a Master Editor and is entitled to display this Platinum Editor Star.
"Saves" are the articles that I advocated keeping in WP:AfD, made non-trivial edits to in support of their retention, and which were, in fact, retained. I'm not claiming sole credit for any of these, just keeping track of time spent on things that didn't deserve to be deleted when they could have been improved. A save, in my mind, is a slight mark against either the nominating editor who nominated a fixable article for deletion, the editors who had previously left it in a deletion-worthy state, or both. AfD is for things that are of questionable encyclopedic value, and many articles which stink at the moment do merit Wikipedia inclusion. These are the ones I intervened at AfD to save--I didn't pick them, and wouldn't have started most of these articles, but saw potential where others did not.
Deleted articles that I both undeleted (or had the text retrieved for me by an admin when I no longer was an administrator) and fixed the associated problem which had prompted the deletion. Shame that they were deleted, but this is one really good reason to give article builders admin tools.
To help you in your efforts to whack off the vandals, you need every weapon you can get in your arsenal. I therefore award you this vandal whacking stick. You've proven you can put it to good use. DoczillaSTOMP! 08:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
For diligent and faithful service to the Wikipedia community through your work at WP:3O. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 18:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Gold Hat (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Barnstars
The Barnstar of Diligence
For doing the responsible thing with respect to your recent AN/I report. xenocidic ( talk ¿ listen ) 02:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I hereby award this star to Jclemens for keeping Pau Gasol vandalism free. Much Appreciated! Gamloverks (talk) 04:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Recovery
This award is presented for repeated and tireless efforts to save articles which deserve to be on Wikipedia, but which were on the brink of being lost because of a lack of complete information, a lack of references, or other problems, but which - thanks to research and investment by Jclemens - have been recovered, and constitute a valuable addition to Wikipedia. Exucmember (talk) 05:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Civility Award
Citation for Jclemens: For admirable civility in the face of extremely contentious editing, rudeness, pettiness - in short, about the most maddening situations that a Wikipedia editor ever finds himself in. Well-done. Exucmember (talk) 05:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Recovery
This award is presented for tireless and civil efforts to save rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated. Jclemens has also rescued other articles which deserve to be on Wikipedia, but which were on the brink of being lost because of a lack of complete information, a lack of references, or other problems. Through Jclemens' research and investment these articles have been recovered, and constitute a valuable addition to Wikipedia. --Dan Dassow (talk) 18:37, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
I am honored to award you this barnstar for you continued efforts all accross wikipedia, and more importantly for your rescues of articles when nominators fail in their consideration of WP:ATD, thus forcing it to be some other editor's WP:AFTER. Thank you for being an exemplary Wikipedian... and one always working toward the true improvement of the project. Well done! Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 05:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
The Article Rescue Barnstar
The Rescue Barnstar is awarded to people who rescue articles from deletion.
This barnstar is awarded to Jclemens for his incredible work on Yellow Star (Book). You are a true asset to the project, wikipedia is blessed to have such a diligent editor. Ikip (talk) 22:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar
Thanks for doing all the AfD's on the Firefly pages, somebody had to do it ;) Mod.torrentrealm 09:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar
For being one of the few administrators that actually follows the proposed deletion guidelines and makes an independent judgment on the article before deleting it, I hereby award you this barnstar. Thank you for taking the extra time to examine what you are deleting. ThaddeusB (talk) 04:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
The Socratic Barnstar is awarded to those editors who are extremely skilled and eloquent in their arguments.
This barnstar is awarded to Jclemens, for his reasoned and convincing arguments, which I may not always agree with, but I always respect. Okip 04:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar
I hereby award Jclemens this barnstar for his vigilance, sense of justice, and being 'not just talk' in weeding out abusive Admin behaviour. Ohconfucius¡digame! 03:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
The Article Rescue Barnstar
I am pleased to award you this barnstar for you work on 50 Cutest Child Stars: All Grown Up in turning what was essentially a list into an article. While I may have added only one additional ref and cleaned up the ref format somewhat, your work is appreciated. Thanks Schmidt,MICHAEL Q. 06:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
Just wanted to give you props for recognizing the humor and responding in a humorous fashion here. I was hoping to catch a few people out, but it seems I caught almost everyone! I'd thought that sprinkling "proposal" all over the place would have made it clear. Ah well. On an unrelated note, I find it funny that WP:BS points to barnstars. Hrm. :) --Hammersoft (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
Awarded for sensible arguments and unfailing courtesy in deletion debates. AMuseo (talk) 19:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar
For your commitment to the helpful task of Deletion sorting, I commend you. :) Ϫ 17:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
The Surreal Barnstar
For totally making my day with the unexpected use of the word "brouhaha" (which you will notice is one of my favorite words) in this edit, I give you this surreal barnstar. Thanks for lightening up the end of a very long, exhausting day. Ks0stmIf you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 07:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The Featured Sound Main Page Proposal Voter Barnstar
I was truly humbled by the overwhelming community support for the recent proposal to place featured sounds on the main page. The proposal closed on Tuesday with 57 people in support and only 2 in opposition.
It should take a few weeks for everything to get coded and tested, and once that is done the community will be presented with a mock up to assess on aesthetic appeal.
Finally, I invite all of you to participate in the featured sounds process itself. Whether you're a performer, an uploader, or just come across a sound file you find top quality, and that meets the featured sound criteria, you can nominate it at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. Featured sounds is also looking for people to help assess candidates (also at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates.)
I award you with the Barnstar of Integrity for your continued efforts with Debrahlee Lorenzana following 4 DRVs and an MFD. It's amazing to see how stubbornly wrong some people can be at Wikipedia...Smallman12q (talk) 12:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
The Original Barnstar
For excellent work on the controversial Fae case. Nobody agrees with every decision anyone made in that fiasco, but you demonstrated an intelligent approach and obviously were not about to be bullied by anyone. Thanks for your service. Carrite (talk) 01:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
You are definitely a defender of Wikipedia as far as I am concerned. MONGO 00:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
Thank you for your participation in the August 2016 GAN backlog drive! For reviewing 15 articles, you get this award. Thanks again. JAGUAR 14:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar
For your outstanding reviewing skills and dutiful work. Laurdecltalk 07:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy
This was one of the best, most gracious comments I've read in a long while. Thank you for your kindness, perspective, and gentle advocacy against grudge-holding. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
The Reviewer Barnstar
For your comprehensive and attentive review of Myocardial infarction. The article has improved dramatically because of your careful and well thought-out review. A stellar job! Tom (LT) (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
The Mediator Barnstar
For your apparently excellent mentoring skills, and just for all that which you do, do. : ) - jc37 14:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
You deserve it 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
DYK Credits
On 15 June2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marcus J. Ranum, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On 11 August2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hard suction hose, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On 12 September2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hose strap, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On May 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yellow Star (book), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
On 8 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Show Me the Father, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Show Me the Father is the fourth consecutive film produced by the Kendrick brothers to earn an "A+" grade on CinemaScore? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Show Me the Father. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Show Me the Father), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 2 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lifemark, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite the commercial success of previous Kendrick Brothers films, star Kirk Cameron said that Lifemark was unable to secure a distributor due to its pro-life stance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lifemark. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lifemark), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.