Jump to content

User:Mako001/PROD log

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.


November 2021

[edit]
  1. S v Suliman: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. Relies on a single primary source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  2. Behrman v Regional Magistrate, Southern Transvaal: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. Relies on a single primary source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  3. R v Adams (South Africa): PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  4. R v Verity-Amm: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  5. S v Sadeke: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  6. S v Cooper: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  7. S v Whitehead: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  8. S v Naidoo: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  9. S v Mampa: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  10. S v Pakane: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  11. S v Longdistance (Natal): PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  12. S v Moloto: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  13. S v Benjamin: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  14. S v Prins: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  15. S v Grobler: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  16. S v Hendrix: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  17. S v Mlonyeni: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  18. S v Van Vuuren: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  19. S v Mpetha: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  20. S v Dlamini: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  21. S v Shiburi: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  22. Du Toit v DPP: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  23. Shabalala v Attorney-General, Transvaal: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  24. Phato v Attorney-General: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  25. R v Steyn: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  26. S v Tandwa: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  27. S v Mvelase: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  28. S v Chabedi: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  29. S v Ndlovu: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  30. S v Nkondo: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  31. S v Sikhipha: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  32. S v Morrison: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  33. S v Vermaas: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  34. S v Swanepoel: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  35. Ehrlich v CEO, Legal Aid Board: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  36. Hlantlalala v Dyanti: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 06:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  37. Investigating Directorate: Serious Economic Offences v Hyundai: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  38. Magajane v Chairperson, North West Gambling Board: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  39. Nel v Deputy Commissioner of Police, Grahamstown: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  40. Toich v Magistrate, Riversdale: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  41. Minister of Safety & Security v Xaba: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  42. Young v Minister of Safety & Security: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  43. Beheermaatschappij Helling I NV v Magistrate, Cape Town: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  44. Joy Mining Machinery v NUMSA: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  45. Joy Mining Machinery v NUMSA: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:32, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on a single primary source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  46. Brown v Mbhense: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:33, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  47. Lubbe v Volkskas: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:33, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  48. Genna-Wae Properties v Medico-Tronics: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:34, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Possible copyvio. Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  49. Hoffmann v South African Airways: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on a single source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  50. Hitzeroth v Brooks: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on a single source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  51. Verstappen v Port Edward Town Board: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 07:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on a single source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  52. S v Maki: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Possible copyvio. Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  53. Veldman v DPP, Witwatersrand: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  54. B v Governor of Brockhill Prison, ex p Evans: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  55. S v Jackson: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  56. R v Patel: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  57. S v Pretorius: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  58. S v Mtewtwa: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  59. Minister of Health v New Clicks: in re Application for Declaratory Relief: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  60. Eastern Cape v Contract Props: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  61. SA Bus and Taxi Association v Cape of Good Hope Bank: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  62. Woods v Walters: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  63. R v Motomane: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  64. S v Counter: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is unsourced and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  65. R v Mubila: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  66. S v Tembani (1998): PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 08:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  67. Administrator, Transvaal v Theletsane: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  68. Lipschitz v Wolpert and Abrahams: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  69. Mokoena v Administrator, Transvaal: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  70. Pressma Services v Schuttler: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  71. Van Eeden v Minister of Safety & Security: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  72. Minister of Safety & Security v Van Duivenboden: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  73. S v Van As: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  74. Minister of Safety & Security v Hamilton: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:16, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  75. Carmichele v Minister of Safety & Security: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:16, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  76. S v Russell: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  77. Minister of Law & Order v Kadir: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  78. Minister of Police v Ewels: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  79. S v Chretien: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  80. R v Mkize: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  81. R v Schoonwinkel: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  82. S v Lavhengwa: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  83. R v Korsten: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:28, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  84. Jetha v R: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 09:28, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  85. Reddy v Siemens: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 10:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  86. Automotive Tooling Systems v Wilkens: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 10:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  87. David Crouch Marketing v Du Plessis: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 10:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  88. Wolfaardt v Fedlife Assurance: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 10:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  89. Wallach v Lew Geffen Estates: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 10:37, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  90. Jordaan v Verwey: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  91. Rubin v Botha: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  92. Totoyi v Ncuka: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  93. Sweets from Heaven v Ster Kinekor: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  94. Sishen Hotel v Suid-Afrikaanse Yster en Staal Industriële Korporasie: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  95. Business Aviation Corporation v Rand Airport Holdings: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  96. Drymiotis v Du Toit: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  97. Southernport Developments v Transnet: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  98. De Jager v Sisana: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  99. Benlou Properties v Vector Graphics: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  100. Ntshiqa v Andreas Supermarket: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  101. Pete's Warehousing v Bowsink Investments: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  102. Mutual Construction Co v Komati Dam Joint Venture: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  103. R v Shelembe: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  104. Jaftha v Schoeman: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar. It is also a combination of two topics together, since there probably wouldn't be enough to write about on their own.
  105. Hlatshwayo v Hein: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 14:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Legal case which fails WP:GNG. It is based on primary sources only and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar.
  106. Helen Makhuba: BLP PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 15:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
  107. John Gunda: PROD; notified Robertson-Glasgow (talk · contribs) 15:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Poorly sourced, highly negative BLP, should be speedily deleted.

December 2021

[edit]
  1. Sam Hargraves: BLP PROD; notified Debosilla (talk · contribs) 08:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
  2. Glenn Van Wieren: BLP PROD; notified Debosilla (talk · contribs) 08:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

[edit]
  1. Hassan Niknafs: PROD; notified Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk · contribs) 06:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Non-notable university leader, for a university which seems to have had its page deleted.

April 2022

[edit]
  1. F1 H2O Nations Cup: PROD; notified Comcentrica (talk · contribs) 04:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Unsourced. I also suspect it to be mostly a copyvio, although I can't find where it came from. The editor who created this did some substantial copyvios.

June 2022

[edit]
  1. Alexey Bokov: PROD; notified AnotherTimeline (talk · contribs) 11:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails GNG

June 2023

[edit]
  1. S. Samar Hasnain: PROD; notified Steve Quinn (talk · contribs) 12:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Apparently fails WP:NACADEMIC. Sources provided show that he has done some scientific work, but do not show notability.