User talk:123uhjsakddsa89321l3

There is an archive of past discussions and threads.

---

ITN for 2014 Valparaíso wildfire

--Spencer^T♦C 22:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

And your photo is on the main page, thanks. Stephen 05:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your good work on photo and translation for 2014 Valparaíso wildfire. Balaenoptera musculus (talk) 15:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

It's my pleasure to contribute. Thank you for the barnstar. Best regards, Küñall (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Pichilemu/GA4

Hi. I've opened a GAR on the Pichilemu article for which you are the main contributor. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding prose and focus; if you're interested, see Talk:Pichilemu/GA4 for more details. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 13:32, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Fernando Errázuriz Aldunate

I'm done with this.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
hi Kiñall I update article today Please Check this Thanks you --Historiador1923 (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Historiador1923, te daré las razones por las que he revertido los cambios que hiciste al artículo de Fernando Errázuriz. {{other uses}} se utiliza sólo cuando hay más de un Fernando Errázuriz. En este caso, es el único que lleva este nombre con un artículo en Wikipedia, por lo que no se justifica la plantilla.(BUENO EN ESOS TIENES RAZON SI ES ASI, PERO NO TIENE EL NOMBRE COMPLETO , POR ESOS TAMBIEN SE PUEDE COLOCAR) La imagen en el infobox no debe llevar su propio código wiki. Se agrega este de forma automática sólo añadiendo el nombre del archivo. De todas formas, la imagen a color de Errázuriz es de menor calidad que la en blanco y negro, por lo que también la he revertido. (NO TOMABA CON EL PROPIO NOMBRE , POR ESO LA PUSE ASI POR QUE ASI LA TOMABA) La imagen de la abdicación de O'Higgins también la retiré, puesto que no procede en este caso. Errázuriz no se encontraba allí, y sólo ingresó al gobierno provisional después de la abdicación. En el artículo de Errázuriz, la imagen no tiene relevancia.(FALSO EL ESTABA PRESENTE EN LA ABDICACION, SE PUEDE APRECIAR SU FIGURA EN DICHA IMAGEN Y DE HECHO SU IMAGEN ACTUALESTA SACADA DE AHI , INCLUSO LA EN BLANCO Y NEGRO QUE TU TIENES ESTA SACADA DE ESTE CUADRO) No es necesario entregar el nombre de todos los hijos, basta con colocar 8.(TIENE CUATRO HIJOS RELEVANTES Y CON INTERES ENCICLOPEDICO EN WIKI Y TIENE TRES HERMANOS CON ARTICULOS EN WIKI CON INTERES ENCICLOPEDICO) Saludos, y cualquier duda que tengas, pregunta antes de editar. Küñall (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2014 (UTC) (HE EDITADO MUCHAS VECES Y NUNCA PE HABIAN CONDICIONADO MI LIBERTAD, YO SIEMPRE HE RESPETANDO LOS PILARES DE WIKIPEDEA) Hola Kuñall Gracias por escribirme Por favor dime lo siguiente. La imagen de la abdicacion de O´Higgins si tiene relevancia en este articulo debido a que fue un hecho protagonica de nuestra historia y como puedes ver el personaje central de dicha imagen es Fernando Errazuriz Normalmente es de interes enciclopedico su desendencia inmediata , debido a que cuatro hijos de el tienen articulos en wikipedea en español y tambien pueden estar en Ingles. La Imagen que incorpora es mas atractiva que la actual , de hecho la actual es una version Antigua de la que yo tengo que es a color. La pexelacion es por el acercamiento de la imagen. El Indice que coloco es de facil lectura para que tenga un interes enciclopedico. Por favor espero tu colaboracion a fin de proceder con un articulo mas interesante y novedoso de este personaje Un Saludos afectuoso --Historiador1923 (talk) 19:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñall conteste cada una de tus aseveraciones donde tienes errors de historia importantes espero tu respuesta y un saludos afectuoso --Historiador1923 (talk) 19:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Bueno, has dejado un desorden con tus respuestas... por lo que te responderé aquí: No es necesaria la plantilla, como ya te dije, porque Fernando Errázuriz Aldunate redirige a Fernando Errázuriz. La imagen en blanco y negro es de mejor calidad que la pixelada, por lo tanto, a pesar de que está en blanco y negro, debe permanecer esta, ya que tu versión es un detrimento a la calidad del artículo. Tal vez la imagen sí sea relevante, pero debes colocar una descripción más completa. Un lector inglés no entenderá qué hace esa pintura de la abdicación de O'Higgins en el artículo de un presidente que ejerció casi 10 años después. Debes colocar, no sé, "Errázuriz was present at the abdication of Bernardo O'Higgins, in 1922", por ejemplo. Si los hijos tienen relevancia en la Wikipedia española, no necesariamente la tienen acá. Dame los enlaces de éstos. Además, los detalles del matrimonio de Errázuriz deben ser incluidos en una sección "Personal life", donde allí puedes expandir quienes fueron sus hijos (no necesariamente los más notables, sino que ahí los puedes incluir todos), quien fue su esposa, etc. Los infoboxes se supone, deben ser un compendio resumido del artículo biográfico, no una biografía en sí. No se a qué te refieres con el índice, pero por tu poco conocimiento del inglés, es preferible que lo practiques en tu zona de pruebas antes de agregarlo al artículo, y pedirme a mí o a algún otro wikipedista que lo corrija antes de que lo agregues. Porque, por ejemplo, las banderas que intentaste agregar al infobox aquí no están permitidas. Sí lo están en la Wiki española, pero aquí no. Por último, no me cabe duda de que las ediciones que has hecho las has realizado con las mejores intenciones, yo no estoy 'condicionando tu libertad', sino que, como expuse previamente, tu conocimiento de las políticas de esta Wikipedia son muy básicos, al igual que tu conocimiento del idioma, y es preferible que alguien te guíe. Yo te puedo ayudar, pero siempre con respeto (personalmente, no me gusta que me escriban con mayúsculas, parecen gritos.) Si vas a responderme, hazlo debajo de mi firma, no entre medio de mis comentarios. Saludos cordiales, Küñall (talk) 22:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Estimator Kuñall Repuse la version para arreglarla de acuerdo a lo que me dices . Dame un día para repararla por favor y te contesto sobre los nuevos artículos Nota: puse mi respuesta en mayúscula para que la vieras y no como grito Ten un poco de paciencia y la mejoro en 24 horas Muchas gracias y muchos saludos en California donde tu estas Un abrazo desde aquí --Historiador1923 (talk) 01:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Historiador1923: Te solicito que hagas las ediciones en tu zona de pruebas, como lo indiqué arriba, para que puedas experimentar sin afectar el artículo en cuestión hasta que los contenidos cumplan con las políticas de estilo de la Wikipedia en inglés. No lo tomes a mal, sólo quiero enseñarte que las cosas aquí no funcionan como en la Wikipedia española. Cualquier cosa que necesites, aquí estoy. --Küñall (talk) 01:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC) (PD. Vivo en Chile) Kuñall Bueno entonces editame un taller para que lo veas y apruebes los cambios. Muchas gracias y espero tu respuesta. PD Wikipedia española , todos sus bibliotecarios son muy buenos y muy serios , son un ejemplo de caballerosidad y paciencia ( nadie nace sabiendo, sólo se puede aprender. Muchos saludos y espero que crees mi taller Un gran abrazo y que bueno que seas Chileno --Historiador1923 (talk) 01:40, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Historiador1923, solo copia el contenido de Fernando Errázuriz a tu zona de pruebas (User:Historiador1923/sandbox) y trabaja allí en el contenido. Una vez que estés listo, o quieras que lo revise, me avisas. Saludos. Küñall (talk) 02:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Küñall Ok lo haré y te aviso para tu corrección Gracias y saludos --Historiador1923 (talk) 03:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñall Por favor puedes revizar mi taller que mi hiciste (User:Historiador1923/sandbox) Muchas Gracias --Historiador1923 (talk) 04:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC) User:Historiador1923, lo he visto y está redactado pobremente. Te recomiendo que lo trabajes más (la redacción en inglés) y que aglutines varias oraciones en una, porque has creado varias secciones que perfectamente pueden coexistir juntas en un párrafo. NO agregues tus cambios al artículo todavía. Küñall (talk) 04:53, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñall Por favor me puedes indicar o suguerir los cambios que tu quieres Gracias y espero tu respuesta --Historiador1923 (talk) 04:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC) User:Historiador1923: Como te dije, el artículo está escrito en un inglés pobrísimo, por lo que si aún así lo añadieras al artículo, alguien más lo revertiría, no por vandalismo, sino que porque no se entendería. Omites el sujeto en casi todas las oraciones. En algunas uno puede suponer que se trata de Errázuriz, pero debe incluirse el "he", o "she". No adentraré en eso porque no te daré un curso de inglés jajaja. Ahora, sí, todo lo que agregaste puede ser fácilmente compendiado en una sola sección: "Biography". Las subsecciones son básicamente, innecesarias. Küñall (talk) 05:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Estimado Kuñall Los subtitulos en historia se ocupan para separar los distintos tiempos historicos trascendentes. para que asi universalmete sea comprendido por el lector en forma facil y separda (matematicas o aritmetica) se ejemplifica una explicacion historica. Por otra parte solicito tu concurso a fin que mejores el ingles redactado, como me lo ofreciste al inicio de esta discussion Si quieres juntar hechos historicos dime cuales a fin de analizarlos y hacerlo Espero tu respuesta Muchas gracias --Historiador1923 (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Historiador1923: El tema es que dichos "subtítulos" aquí no se usan cuando un artículo es tan pequeño. Estarías yendo contra las políticas de estilo, que como muchas veces te he mencionado, están disponibles en WP:MOS. Aún si el artículo tuviera una extensión mayor, no se justificarían tantas secciones. Puedes revisar Agustín Ross Cultural Center; el artículo está dividido en varias secciones, pero solo porque se justifica, el artículo es largo. Para un artículo como el tuyo, se procede como en el artículo de Aníbal Pérez o Anselmo Sule: una pequeña descripción, una sección "Biography", las referencias, y chao pescao. Finalmente, una vez que proveas el artículo de fuentes para todas las afirmaciones que has hecho, le meteré mano. Küñall (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñil Por favor este es un articulo de un Presidente y formador de la Republica, la historia por favor hay que respetarla y no es chacota. los tiempos historicos son importantes , no son menores, sobre todo en este personaje que nacio bajo el impererio español, patria vieja, patria nueva y republica. En cuanto a las referencias estan todas en el articulo en español. Espero tu colaboracion --Historiador1923 (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Historiador1923: Aquí tampoco es chacota el manual de estilo de los artículos, debes respetarlo. Los tiempos históricos son relevantes... en el artículo de la Historia de Chile. En una biografía no. Aquí por lo menos no se trabaja así como tu pretendes. Si las referencias están allá, pues añadelas a tu borrador. Yo no iré por ellas... es tu trabajo. Küñall (talk) 05:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñil Referencias agregadas, dime que tiempos historicos quieres que junte y los junto Espero tu colaboracion saludos --Historiador1923 (talk) 05:40, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Mi nombre de usuario es Küñall, no Kuñil. Ya te lo dije, júntalos todos, tienes muy poca información ahí como para justificar todas esas secciones. Júntalos todos. Küñall (talk) 05:41, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñall Perdon por la equivocacion , no es para enojarse ahi lo junte lo mas que pude , , ahora te toca a ti Gracias y espero tu respuesta --Historiador1923 (talk) 06:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Buenos dias Kuñall Por favor verlo y colaborara Espero pronto tu respuesta Gracias --Historiador1923 (talk) 12:24, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñal En cuanto a la imagen yo cre que tienes razon, que te parece que cree una imagen nueva con Buena resolucion , la subo y la ponemos?? Después de terminar este artículo , puedo crear otro y tu me lo corriges? Gracias y espero tu respuesta --Historiador1923 (talk) 17:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñal Me puedes contester por favor y por que me borraste todas mis fotos, no te parece que es como mucho? --Historiador1923 (talk) 20:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Historiador1923: yo no he borrado nada, un administrador de Commons lo hizo porque subiste varios archivos que infringían los derechos de autor. Respecto a tu artículo, ya te di mis recomendaciones, no las has tomado del todo. Yo te dije que lo revisaría pero no que lo corregiría. Por ahora, sería preferible que lo mantuvieras en tu zona de pruebas hasta que lo puedas redactar bien. Tiene mala redacción. Las secciones siguen prácticamente igual (entiende, todo el texto que pusiste debiera estar en una sola sección: Biography. Quizás "President of Chile" pueda mantenerse por sí misma, pero las otras c'est fini). Puedes tomarlo o dejarlo. Küñall (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Hola Kuñall Gracias por contester, Primero me dijiste que tu me corregirias la redaccion, por favor hazlo como me indicaste al comienzo de esta discussion. Segundo en mi discussion aparece que tu me borraste las fotos, incluso me bloqueaste para escribir en tu discussion en español. bueno contestame si puedo escribir otro articulo aqui ? y te junto todo ahora para terminar con esto y asi poder poner correcto el articulo mensionada Gracias y espero tu respuesta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiador1923 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Review of Article Nicolas Chaillan (following our conversation on IRC)

Hello Küñall,

I have fixed all the requests from the IRC team to make the article compliant with everything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nicolas_Chaillan

I would love if you could take few minutes to review it and hopefully approve it let me know what needs to be changed?

Thank you very much again.

Tom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom.kutner (talk • contribs) 04:39, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Sietecolores (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

You and Historiador1923 are reverting each other without any discussion. Despite the fact that your believe his contributions are written poorly and should be removed, blanket reverting them with no discussion still constitutes an edit war as they are not vandalism. Discussing the changes on the talk page to form a consensus is the proper way to handle a disagreement, if Historiador1923 refuses to discuss the changes then he can be referred to WP:DR and eventually blocked should he refuse to discuss changes. Best, Mifter (talk) 00:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Online harassment

You should report or make it known here in Wikipedia you are being harassed by an individual who even bothered to create a website with your real name. Specially since that seems to originate from a WP dispute. That is not ok. Sietecolores (talk) 12:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I have reported the stuff to administrators. It's not like I care too much about what they did, but I requested it be gone from Wikipedia. Thanks for your concern :) Diego Grez (talk) 15:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Precious again

Pichilemu

Thank you for quality articles for project Chile on education, such as List of schools in the Cardenal Caro Province, and people such as the mayors of Pichilemu including Orlando Cornejo, stressing democracy on the Main page, and for Komm, gib mir deine Hand, - you are an Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 513th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt, it was really nice from you. Thanks (sorry for not responding earlier, didn't see this one) Diego Grez (talk) 14:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 513 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks again Gerda Arendt, that was really nice! Küñall (talk) 05:42, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Memoria Chilena screenshot.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Memoria Chilena screenshot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:46, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK Medals

		The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Thanks for your contributions to DYK. Freikorp (talk) 00:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Your work is appreciated. Freikorp (talk) 00:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Noticed you were long overdue for these. I counted 51 DYKs attributed to your Diego Grez account. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 00:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir(Islamic Students Forum) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir(Islamic Students Forum). Since you had some involvement with the Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir(Islamic Students Forum) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mario Bichón.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mario Bichón.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Madre Rosa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Madre Rosa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:La Tercera, 12 September 2013.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:La Tercera, 12 September 2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Presidents of the University of Santiago, Chile Student Federation has been nominated for discussion

Category:Presidents of the University of Santiago, Chile Student Federation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

123uhjsakddsa89321l3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have just noticed this account has not been blocked after I was banned in October 2015. Please block. But at the same time I want to request my unbanning. I don't want to get into details because, although I strongly disagree with the reasonings, consensus was made to ban me and I respect that. However, I would like to be unbanned with the condition of not returning to editing anything related to something I may be related to (that includes my former school, the newspaper I own and my own article if it ever gets created). If I get caught editing anything I have just proposed, I may be re-blocked indefinitely again. I think it's been a good time (almost three years) to rethink things and give myself a new chance editing Wikipedia. It's something that appassionates me as I truly believe in free knowledge. I don't think I will be back "fully", since I cannot devote the time I once dedicated to being here. I created several hundreds of articles, some of which were promoted to good and featured status, and lots were included in the DYK section. I hope you to consider this humble request. Kind regards.

Decline reason:

This is a block request, oddly, so I've gone ahead and blocked. You'll need to appeal from your main account, by the way, but the questions Harry asks below will need to be answered. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

pinging @HJ Mitchell: my former mentor, who I think may comment. --Küñall (talk) 02:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Hey Diego. Now, you know I'm probably more sympathetic to you than most admins, but even i'm struggling to work out what's going on here. I've just wasted an hour of my life trawling through various ANI threads trying to work it all out. Before I look any further (and as this is a community ban, it'll have to go to AN for review—I couldn't unblock you unilaterally even if I was uninvolved) I need two things: I want to know why you want to be unblocked and what you would do on the English Wikipedia if you were unblocked, and I need a list of all your accounts and previous usernames. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi @HJ Mitchell: you are right, I thought you would be (in some way) willing to have a look. Thanks for that. I tried to remember other users who could, somehow, help me but I couldn't. I didn't mean to waste your time. Now, responding your questions: I want to be unblocked firstly because I think it's been a good time since I was banned, have not done trouble ever since, and I am no longer interested in "promoting" stuff that proved controversial and eventually led to my ban. I am sorry for whatever trouble I made. I only intend to make minor changes, mainly since I think I can be more active on Commons, as writing demands too much time here, and I'm renaming files often, so that drives me here commonly... I made one edit here without noticing, by renaming one file! So that's it, only minor edits I think; maybe creating some articles on members of the Chilean parliament, as I have done on the Spanish Wikipedia. Regarding usernames, I don't recall others, and even if I did I do not know their passwords; that includes my old bot which goes as Diego Grez Bot and I think has not been blocked. But that's it, nothing else to hide! @TonyBallioni: I cannot ask for unblock on my main account since I no longer can access it. That's the reason I asked here. --Küñall (talk) 15:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

By the way, should I re-add an {{unblock}} request? --Küñall (talk) 15:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I’ve requested a CheckUser look at your account. If that comes back clean, I’ll think about copying the above declined appeal. If I don’t, I’ll let you know and you can reuse the template then. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I've checked my saved passwords and there is an account named Goesdrum but I don't think I created it, it might have been someone else using my computer. It does not have edits, anyway. I made an edit a few days ago using my IP, but it's pretty clear it is me, I state it on a comment. Küñall (talk) 18:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

• I see the aforementioned logged-out edit, which was indeed self-disclosed. As far as Goesdrum goes, there's a decent amount of logged out editing from March 2018 that looks like Goesdrum and has essentially the same technical data as Küñall. I would have seen that anyway, but the disclosure of that account makes me feel a bit more open-minded. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Addendum: running the IP editor's contributions through the editor interaction analyzer, I don't really see how you could claim they're from someone else using your computer, unless this person developed a strong interest in the same articles you used to edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
    • Per the above comment by NinjaRobotPirate, I am now unwilling to copy this to AN. If want another administrator to consider your request, you should make a new unblock request. Otherwise, I think you should wait until at least October to file one since that will have been 6 months since the end of March. Also, I’ve blocked Goesdrum. It’s either you or it’s compromised because you have the password. Either way it needs to be blocked. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: the account password has been saved in my home computer, and it seems to have been used only in the Spanish Wikipedia if you look at its contribs, under a userpage. As a consequence, the IP is obviously mine too, but the account isn't. I just have the password. and I acknowledge I have edited in anonymity, I didn't mean to hide anyway. People knew it was me, too --Küñall (talk) 23:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

So that means the account is either you or it is compromised, so it must be blocked on en.wiki either way. Re: the logged out editing, NinjaRobotPirate was referencing additional edits from the one you disclosed. Like I said, feel free to make a new unblock appeal and see if another admin will copy it to AN. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I can agree it is blocked. For whatever it is worth, I can share all of the IPs I have used during the past three years, I keep a log of them. As I said earlier, I have not done trouble ever since my banning. I have edited, yes, but there was nothing troublesome. I consider that keeping on making these troublesome edits for which I was banned is unworthy, completely fruitless and even stupid from my side. That is why I have proposed, if I get unbanned, to keep myself away from any topic I may be accused of having a conflict of interest. Some of the most "extremist" people, I read on some deletion requests, said that I had a COI by editing Pichilemu-related articles. I am fine with that, I won't edit any Pichilemu-related article, or related to anything I have been related to, like my school, properties or even my alma maters. As in 2010, I may be checked regularly by CUs in order to see I am not "socking". Anyway, as I have said, I may only be back to do some minor edits, since (if time allows me) I am only semi-active in Commons and Spanish Wikipedia. I may be semi-retired from this Wikipedia and at some point plan on actually retiring. Kind regards, --Küñall (talk) 01:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

123uhjsakddsa89321l3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please read above

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

123uhjsakddsa89321l3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's been nearly three months since my last request for unblock. I don't have more words to add to what has been said before, other than self-proposing an auto-ban on articles related to me (that would include some of my GAs, Pichilemu and Colegio...). You can go checkuser me and whatever thing you want to do, I've done nothing wrong. I just want to return to contribute in a constructive way, just like I did for most of my time here. --Küñall (talk) 01:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Once again, your unblock request has not convinced anyone to take action. Your best bet is to wait six months then apply under WP:SO with a more convincing request. Yamla (talk) 12:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I also want to add that I watch a lot of pages related to Chile, and since I am blocked I can't help patrol them actively. Just today, this article, for example, has remained vandalized. Küñall (talk) 02:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

More obvious vandalism that needs reverting

Other changes that need to be made: this one makes reference to the former province of O'Higgins, not the region created in 1975. --Küñall (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

123uhjsakddsa89321l3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's been half a year since I last requested to be unblocked. It's been a lengthy ban that has made me rethink about my past behavior and I'm convinced these actions were not happy, and will not repeat them in future. I registered here in 2006, thirteen years ago, and it seems like it was yesterday, but time passes and people grow old. I made a lot of stupid mistakes, we all do, it's part of growing. It would be foolish to repeat them all over again, and you can be sure I won't. I would like to return to the encyclopedia, most likely not for active contributing, but for the usual minor corrections, referencing and the like, something I enjoy doing. Also, in the meantime, I have been actively contributing on the Spanish Wikipedia, creating thousands of articles (like I once did here), making a positive contribution. By the way, I have not used socks nor anything. Hopefully you will let me back, after so long. After all, bans are not meant to last forever, are they?

PS. During my time here, I contributed over 50 DYKs (see this, find me as Küñall, my former username), several good articles and tons of new articles.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. I have copied your request here. When the community discussion comes to the conclusion that the ban should be lifted, you should be unblocked, too; if for some reason that's not implemented, you're welcome to make another unblock request. If you want to comment on the discussion while it's ongoing, you're welcome to leave comments here and ask others to copy them over. If you ping me by adding both a link to my user page and your signature to an edit, I'll take a look; otherwise I expect people contributing to the discussion will also check your talk page and see such comments. Huon (talk) 21:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks Huon, much appreciated. Cuatro Remos (talk) 21:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

@Nosebagbear: I would appreciate if you could copy this over to the noticeboard. Indeed, as you note, I was blocked not long ago at the Spanish Wikipedia, as SirEdimon says, over a dispute on the José Antonio Kast article. I disagreed with one of the users, who is their supporter, for pushing a version of the article which is very favorable to the politician, a very controversial one in Chile, specifically for being a far-right politician, using several references to support this fact. As I saw their proposal, I used a mean word, related to sex (intended to mean it was self-pleasing) to describe their changes. I did not contest the block, mainly because it was really short, and because I also agreed it was not a great word choice to describe my opinion. Anyway, I apologized to the user in question. During my block, however, they kept pushing some changes favorable to Kast. You can have a look at the article talk: several other users have agreed that this user (Juan Villalobos) took advantage of my block to keep on pushing these POV-ish changes, and there is (some) consensus that Villalobos' edits should be reverted. Explaining this, I want to mean that I was blocked just for an unhappy word choice, not particularly for the editorial dispute. I hope this can clarify this situation. Cuatro Remos (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

@Nosebagbear: I made some edits to my previous comment, I'm sorry I made them too late for you to notice before adding them to the noticeboard. Cuatro Remos (talk) 22:07, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

@Huon: If possible, I would like to withdraw my request for discussion. I have seen that the responses are negative, and I can understand their reasoning. It was not a great timing, in the first place, to put up this request. Thanks for your collaboration, helping out for putting this up at the noticeboard. Hopefully, this will be over sometime. Thanks again and kindest regards. Cuatro Remos (talk) 12:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Done. Huon (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

@Bearcat: in response to your comment at the AFD for Jorge Vargas González, I was in the process of revamping the article some years ago, but did not complete. In the meantime, I published two books on the history of Pichilemu, one of them which comprises his mayoral term. It wasn't a great time for the town, specially since it became "known" nationally for the controversies he caused. There was an article, which was deleted, that contained the controversies (Pichilemu political controversies). I believe there is enough coverage to warrant an article for Vargas, although as I said he may be more known for the trouble he caused rather than his contribution to local progress. Cuatro Remos (talk) 00:27, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Heredero de tu amor.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heredero de tu amor.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Harold Camping.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harold Camping.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gaioa (T C L) 16:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Harold Camping.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harold Camping.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gaioa (T C L) 15:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

2020 unblock request

{{unblock}}

Orphaned non-free image File:The Clinic Especial 40 Años.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Clinic Especial 40 Años.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of El Cocinero de Ross

The article El Cocinero de Ross has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pichilemu City Council members by term header

Template:Pichilemu City Council members by term header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 14:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)