User talk:219.77.28.65

January 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Akhtar Mansour, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks Materialscientist. I understand that I didn't provide any source for his birth date. Thanks for writing. 219.77.28.65 (talk) 11:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edward III of England

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to Edward III; i have reverted it because the infobox became unmanageably large ~ stretching past three sections and into a fourth on my reasonably-sized screen ~ and because you inserted one or more wlinks to DAB pages, which is not good practice; this article is a featured article, one of our best, so if you want to make large changes, i suggest you raise the issue on the talk page. Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 12:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Álvaro Delgado (politician). Thank you. Johnnie Bob (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but at least arrange Delgado's offices in order and don't restore to the previous edit. Also, what poorly referenced, aren't they true? Please let me know asap, thanks. 219.77.28.65 (talk) 04:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Moxy🍁 04:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry. If anything else is wrong, please let me know asap, thanks. 219.77.28.65 (talk) 03:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2024

Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Major have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. We do not number British Prime Ministers. You also made several other unexplained changes which did not appear to be particularly helpful. DuncanHill (talk) 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hristijan Mickoski. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Hristijan Mickoski shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 12:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for José Raúl Mulino

On 5 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article José Raúl Mulino, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply to me here, please ping me. 03:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead image for John Bercow

Hi, I noticed you recently changed the lead image for the John Bercow article. It's a very old photo (from 2009) and I don't think is a good representation of his current appearance. I've replaced it with a more recent one from 2018. Fragglet (talk) 18:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.