User talk:Ainlina/Awards and warnings

This page is for awards, praise, warnings and criticism only. For all other purposes, please use my talk page. Notes moved here have been acknowleged.

Hello

You seem to have posted something on my talk page by mistake. --Xyzzyplugh (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for making my Penumbra Requiem article a stub,I don't know how to do it.Jamhaw (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)jamhaw[reply]

Template:Guam

First, please sign if you're going to leave something in my talk page. Second, the "subst" templated message does not make sense. I've explained everything in the edit summary. The person creating the 95% invalid section has been creating unsourced and unreferenced and badly narrated and badly described materials that look like of elementary school project quality. It's bordering vandalism. HkCaGu (talk) 07:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning?

Ummm, sorry, but it would be better if you had looked into the situation at Georgi Parvanov before posting such a message on my talkpage. I know it's an automated message, but still I've made only to reverts and they were removal of libellous unsourced inormation from the article of a living person per the Wikipedia policy. I've even asked administrators to protect the page from editing by anonymous users, they agreed it was disruptive, but said it was not frequent enough to justify protection. Just to get you into the story - IPs from the same range from Varna, Bulgaria have been adding the same libellous stuff (obviously unsourced) to the article for over an year now. It has been reverted by no less than 15 different users for that period - most often by me since I monitor the page. Also I'm well aware of 3RR and know where to stop, don't worry. Sorry, if I sound harsh, but the warning was highly unjustified - therefore I'm removing it. --Laveol ^T 15:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: AIV

Hello Ainlina

I just thought I'd let you know that, the reason your reports did not process is because in one case, no warnings had been accounted for. And the other, they had not been warned enough. Thanks, Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 12:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Thank you for making a report about 202.69.42.4 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If they continue to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! -- lucasbfr ^talk 13:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]