User talk:Bob Schiers

Welcome!

Hello, Bob Schiers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 21:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am fairly new to Wikipedia. I am having trouble uploading pictures to my page Florence Mary Bird, Sculpture because is says my account is not confirmed. I am sure it is something I am doing wrong but it is very frustrating as I am logged in and seem to have an account. I also can't get the two notification boxes at the top of my article to go away although I have rectified the issues. Please help me with...

Bob Schiers (talk) 14:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC) bob SchiersBob Schiers (talk) 14:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read here. In summary, if your account is more than 4 days old and you have more than 100 edits, you are 'autoconfirmed' which means you can create and move pages, and upload images. For users accessing Wikipedia through Tor or an exempted blocked IP address, that limit is 90 days and 100 edits. If you feel I haven't answered your query, feel free to put the {{help me}} template back. I'll take a look at the article and make some standard style changes. --BurritoBazooka If you reply here, please add {{ping|BurritoBazooka}} to your message 18:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's four days and ten edits, a hurdle you took earlier today. And you indeed were able to upload those images (in fact, you uploaded three different copies of one of them; I'll delete the superfluous two).

Some comments on the article:

It needs higher-quality references. Wikipedia content should be based on reliable third-party sources such as newspapers or reputable art magazines. Blogs or social media like Facebook generally are not considered reliable by Wikipedia. A page of image search results also is not a reliable source; there's no editorial oversight for such search results, and you basically ask our readers to draw a conclusion that Google doesn't even state.
It needs footnotes to clarify which source supports which part of the draft. For example, "As she became oriented to the scenery and history of this beautiful state, she was inspired to paint landscapes and riverscapes of the Wisconsin River and the confluence with the great Mississippi." - which of the references would I need to look up to confirm that statement? WP:Referencing for beginners explains how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes for the sources.
It has some tone issues. In the above sentence, "beautiful state" - that's a personal opinion, not a statement of fact. Maybe I consider the state ugly, monotonous and drab - who would claim that my sense of beauty is wrong and theirs is the authoritative one? Similarly, "great Mississippi" - is that a comment on the amount of water it carries at the confluence? If so, wouldn't that be rather off-topic in an article on a sculptor?
Since we don't have articles on any other persons named "Florence Mary Bird", there is no need for disambiguation, and I have moved the page to shorten the title and remove the "Sculptor". Huon (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Florence Mary Bird for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florence Mary Bird is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Mary Bird until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FASTILY 00:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bob Schiers. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Florence Mary Bird, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mothra - A mythological portrait.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mothra - A mythological portrait.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hello, please have a look at WP:REFB for a basic guide to adding references and WP:RS for what constitutes a reliable source. (Wikipedia does not regard itself as reliable per WP:UGC). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 17:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cabot Creamery

Hello, Bob Schiers. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Cabot Creamery, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]