User talk:Bodhipup

March 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Reason I Jump, you may be blocked from editing. Nardog (talk) 21:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. What I am trying to do is ESTABLISH a neutral point of view in the article. The version I edited egregiously violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy. The criticisms of the book The Reason I Jump should be placed in a "Controversies" section rather than in the main body of the article. Language such as "alleged" discredits the book and author and implies (without convincing or widely accepted evidence) that the stated author did not write the book and/or that there is a general consensus that the author did not write the book. Language of "researchers dismiss all claims that Higashida actually wrote the book himself" is patently false without evidence showing a breadth of criticisms. Such evidence is not provided. There is no widespread agreement, either among psychologists or the general public or in the autistic community, that Higashida did not write the book. To state that there is, without evidence, clearly violates the NPOV policy. Again, criticisms of the book, including by researchers and others, can be placed in a "Controversies" section and explored fully there. Also, the version I edited violates Wikipedia's Disability/Style Advice by using language and terminology that is NOT preferred by the group in question. While person-first language used to be the standard, there is an emerging consensus in the autistic community that "person with autism" is offensive. For the reasoning, see this post at the Autism Self-Advocacy Network. For the research showing the consensus, see "Does Language Matter" in the Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders. My edits are intended to ESTABLISH a neutral point of view in this article and follow the disability style advice. Simply restoring the original version does not bring the article into alignment with Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Bodhipup (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Gagliano (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spinster300 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many sources by the subject herself. Please find reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 18:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monica Gagliano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 18:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bodhipup! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 18:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Women in Red

Hello Bodhipup! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women. I would like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women in Red, a WikiProject focused on creating content regarding women's biographies, women's works, and women's issues and assisting contributors who run into difficulties. If you wish to participate, please visit our WikiProject Women in Red page and click on the Join Women in Red button on the right. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 22:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

asilvering (talk) 22:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Gagliano has been accepted

Monica Gagliano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 22:52, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bodhipup. Thank you for your work on 'Aulani Wilhelm. Another editor, CanonNi, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. Please add the article to some categories. (HotCat can help)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CanonNi}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 05:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CanonNi: Just learning about categories, thx for the link. Have added some. Bodhipup (talk) 06:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cristina Eisenberg (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews and other primary sources don't count towards notability. Please also remove the external links from the article body.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cristina Eisenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 01:43, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cristina Eisenberg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cristina Eisenberg. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cristina Eisenberg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cristina Eisenberg. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cristina Eisenberg has been accepted

Cristina Eisenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 23:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]