User talk:Bucephalus

This is my talk page.

Please leave messages at the bottom of the page. I will get back to as soon as I can on your own talk page.

Please, however, do not alter other people's comments. If it is vandalism or is offensive I will delete it myself.

Clout

My pleasure — I only hope that it does some good. There are at least two other accounts in use, User:Clout and another that I've forgotten for the moment. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:37, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Clout

I am a friend of Jessiah and i salute your attitude towards Clout. Thankyou my username is BentGalaxy

Thanks for your note re the vandal. I don't do much blocking, but boy, did he deserve it.

Like your user name, by the way. My two daughters are called Roxane and Alexandra. Deb 17:47, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Bucephalus, clout akcowledges you. please let clout be a definition. write to the user clout with your answer. thank you. the answer

dont let Mel take over your mind, you ride a horse what does he ride? you, i dont think so.

Image source

Thank you for uploading Image:Bucephalus.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you. --Ellmist 20:26, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Even though you say "pd-art", you still need to give the source of this image. --Ellmist 20:26, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

What Wikipedia:WikiProject Rankings project is not

This is not suggesting a hierarcal system.
It will be used only by users who want to use it.
Only ranking will be assigend to users who want to use it.
The idea ment to make it like barn stars, but based on regular contribution.
It is currently a prototype, likely that it is nothing like the final version.

I urge you to reconsider your vote based on this clarification. Thanks Cat ^chi? 08:45, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image source/licensing for Image:Bucephalus.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:Bucephalus.jpg, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:19, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know how to use this talk page but Bucephalus, this ip is a high school, so you can expect plenty of vandalism coming from it.

Thanks. It isn't though. It is some kind of roaming/changing ip. --Bucephalus talk to me 19:29, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion tags

Thank you for your work scouring the New Pages list for bad articles. I noticed that you used {delete} on CalendarHub. This tag has been deprecated as it makes extra effort on the part of the admin who actually deletes the page. If an article is worthy of speedy deletion, you should be able to give a reason why. In your edit summary you wrote advert. In the future please tag as {db|advert}. This will make it much easier on the admin and requires only three extra key strokes. Thanks. --WAvegetarian 18:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Check out Wikipedia:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion#Templates for more info. --WAvegetarian 18:31, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing your signature

Please read Help:Preferences#Your_nickname. Uncle G 13:46, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Branham

I cited my source on that article.--84.159.201.24 22:18, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

huh?

You created a page with a speedy tag. Huh? That makes no sense to me. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vilhelm Hammershøi

we like your page on Vilhelm Hammershøi very much.

Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

This user is a member of the Saints WikiProject.

Thanks! --evrik 16:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, saints aren't really my thing. Thanks for the invite and good luck with your project. --Bucephalus 19:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Babassu oil edit

Nice catch, thanks! Waitak 03:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vilhelm Hammershøi

You have culled the Vilhelm Hammershøi page and hidden the history. I am sure that much of the content you have removed is not copyrighted (though I'm not certain that some wasn't). I think there was stuff that I wrote myself that is now gone. Unfortunately I can't check as there are no old versions. What material do you believe was violating copyright? Is there a copy of the pre-culled version somewhere so people can see the differences? Wouldn't it have been better to discus the matter on the talk page before making these permanent changes? --Bucephalus 21:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will you be answering my questions or are you just going to ignore me? --Bucephalus 19:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I realise that you are an administrator and I am not, but that doesn't mean that you get to ignore my perfectly reasonable questions. Please answer. --Bucephalus 20:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hurry up and look. You could have asked for this on the Wikipedia:Help desk, BTW. -- Zanimum 20:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Bucephalus,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you lack of vandal fighting experience. Please use proper warnings with appropriate edit summaries, see WP:VAND. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego ^talk 22:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you have no cock and are a nigger. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.251.51.194 (talk) 17:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep that in mind. Thank you for your contribution. --Bucephalus (talk) 23:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'll stop now, I just had too much caffeine this morning. It got me a few laughs, oh well, I guess I'm immature. --Dave Willock

P.S.:Seriously though, I'll stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.13.28 (talk) 14:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to re-assert my guilt and "Sorriness". I'm sorry, take care... and continue being the wiki-vigilante. ...</3 -- Dave Willock

And my formatting is rusty, I haven't been on any wiki in ages... <3 --Dave Willock

I love you... </3 --Dave Willock

Call me... <3 --Dave Willock —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.13.28 (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

I have granted rollback to your account. Please be sure to read WP:ROLLBACK thoroughly and be sure to use to tool to revert no more than simple vandalism, or the function will be removed accordingly. Happy editing to you. Keegan^talk 05:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone beat me to it! the wub "?!" 17:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: block on User:165.166.158.24

Re your message: You are correct that usually a final warning is issued, but in this particular case, several anonymous IPs and new accounts have been attempting to add in the same thing to articles related to God. See 24.245.51.216 (talk · contribs), Imaslaveandiamamaster (talk · contribs), and Psychohippie (talk · contribs). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Not problem. It was an unusual circumstance. There was also 70.146.77.20 (talk · contribs), too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how was the edit on broomfleet vandalism? <- by 83.100.208.183

This:[1] is vandalism because wikipedia is not the correct place to advertise Miss Brown's "services". Please try and find something constructive to do. --Bucephalus (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

message moved from user page

Bucephalus,

i am not here to vandalize your page, i am here to say that wikipedia is too complicated and the users are too smart for me. by the way vandalize is not spelled with an s.

-logic

Please see [2] and [3]. Thanks. --Bucephalus (talk) 09:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I CAN"T SEEM TO LEAVE A MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM OF YOUR PAGE.

I AM NEW SO I MAY NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO.

I AM RESPONDING TO YOUR EMAIL REGARDING THE NEW ENTRY FOR MILLENNIUM MAGAZINE.

MY RESPONSE

Hello,

Yes the link you sent us from iStudio is one of our postings.

It is affiliated with Millennium Magazine.

All is the same.

Thank you.

Warren Woodberry Jr.

Publisher Millennium Magazine

YOUR MESSAGE TO ME

MediaWiki Mail wiki@wikimedia.org 6:05 PM (8 minutes ago)

to me Dear Mrwrite7,

The Wikipedia page "User talk:Mrwrite7" has been created on 10 December 2011 by Bucephalus, with the edit summary: potential copyright vio

This is a new page. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mrwrite7 for the current revision.

To contact the editor, visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bucephalus

Note that additional changes to the page "User talk:Mrwrite7" will not result in any further notifications, until you have logged in and visited the page.

           Your friendly Wikipedia notification system  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrwrite7 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jade Goody edit

i apologise, but she deserves the edit. she recently made an inappropriate insinuation about the size of my genitalia. <-by 86.130.147.212

I accept your apology. Now, please, stop vandalising wikipedia. --Bucephalus (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. Blocked anyway. --Rodhull andemu 22:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you are my hero and i love you... marry me?? hey man guess wat i think ur swell i really do u make wiki clean for everyone thanks man ur doing a great job i just hav trouble with the big conversations do u like naruto?? i do its hard to make friends... and well now were friends forevs XD —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wood3lf369 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you. You can stop vandalising wikipedia now. --Bucephalus (talk) 14:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bucephalus. You have new messages at Excesses's talk page.
Message added 19:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

~Excesses~ (talk) 19:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Руссия listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Руссия. Since you had some involvement with the Руссия redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 02:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]