User talk:CharlesFinnegan

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CharlesFinnegan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unfair block: this is my only account.

Decline reason:

I tend to agree with the editors at this discussion that this is unlikely to be a new user's first edit; it seems probable that you have another account, and should use that one to edit Wikipedia or request unblocking, not this one. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CharlesFinnegan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was unregistered!this is my only account. i was editing anonymously before today

Decline reason:

So if we check the IP associated with this account, we'll see lots of helpful content edits? I don't think so. — MBisanz ^talk 23:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CharlesFinnegan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On behalf of this user I am requesting an unblock. We do not block editors because they are using second accounts. Seems some admins need to actually review WP:SOCK. We get new accounts all the time that have full knowledge of how Wikipedia works, and that is never a reason to block them alone. -- Ned Scott 05:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The reason this account has been blocked seems to be that it's first, and indeed only real action, was to dive straight into a tagbomb/editwar over at the MOS. If this user has an reasonable explanation for why they did so, they may be unblocked. However, only this user may provide such evidence, not uninvolved third parties. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.