User talk:Chickenmonkey
| This is Chickenmonkey's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
|
| User | Talk | The Dotted Line | Sandbox | Contributions |
|
I got the sample for "Sparks Fly added if you could check it out see how it looks and edit the summary that'd be great JamesAlan1986 (talk-Contributes) 09:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Also I don't know if the Genre I posted is right. She's considered country pop but "Sparks Fly" feels like a pop song JamesAlan1986 (talk-Contributes) 11:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
My apologies
[edit]I know that I have already apologized for my heated remarks yesterday, but I wanted to explain (not defend) what happened. I let myself get angry at what I believe another editor was and doing, i.e., incrementally dismantling everyone's work on the article and putting inappropriate comments on the talk page. I then let my temper go the wrong way and I am extremely sorry for that. For sure it is going to be a contentious issue and only the future will determine how notable CA will be in the future, you may be right and it will go nowhere past the trial. Anyway, sorry. Mugginsx (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Apology accepted. We all get angry, every now and then. Chickenmonkey 18:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. That is very gracious of you. Mugginsx (talk) 18:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Did not mean to excessive cross-post
[edit]Carol did mention many times she wanted everyone to comment and so many people have put their opinions on the talk page at one time or another on the same issue, I really thought that it would be the right thing to do and the fairest way to do it. Mugginsx (talk) 21:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to insinuate that you would be doing something wrong, only that it would seem to be inefficient. Chickenmonkey 21:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I anwered your message on article talk page. Sorry. Mugginsx (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
As promised
[edit]These are just general articles. I gave the quotes for the individual legal question that I am arguing on the talk page. I still have not found the Signpost article. Too tired tonight. Will check in the morning.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070420/010122.shtml
http://techcrunch.com/2007/12/06/wikipedia-sued-for-nazi-sympathies/
http://www.quora.com/How-does-Wikipedia-avoid-being-sued-for-libel
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100317224000AAvbvha
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/golfer-sues-over-vandalized-wikipedia-page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugginsx (talk • contribs) 18:41, August 7, 2011
- Here is one of the Signport articles I was referring to. (Not to belabor a point but I like to keep my promises.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-05-09/In_the_news . Enough on that. Mugginsx (talk) 19:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Reference Overkill discussion at Talk page of Death of Caylee Anthony
[edit]Would you please weigh in on this discussion? I have never heard of reference overkill in Wiki guidelines, especially on articles on living persons which are BLP issues. I have seen many detailed articles about living person such as this with numerous references because sometimes one reference does not say it all. But whatever your views, as to the right or wrong of it, would you please weigh in? Thanks Mugginsx (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Chickenmonkey. I did not realize that you can retain information even though the link became dead. I will undo my deletion. Mugginsx (talk) 23:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Chickenmonkey 23:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Aronofsky
[edit]Hi ChickenMonkey.
I've not edited before on Wikipedia, but I read the article and it confused me. Further down the paragraph you will see that Pitt is mentioned again, and this is why I thought it didn't make sense. I corrected it as from what I see Brad Pitt was originally intended for the role. Why did you undo my edit?
Thanks
SIMONZZZ
Simonzzz (talk) 12:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- I apologize; the paragraph was poorly written, and I misunderstood it. When you changed Hugh Jackman to Brad Pitt, I assumed that was incorrect when, in fact, it was not; the paragraph just was not clear, because it was constructed in such a way to read as if the project had ultimately become The Fountain, with Pitt in the lead role, and that is not the case. I reworded it to clarify that Pitt was involved in the project, left, and then it ultimately became The Fountain, with Hugh Jackman in the lead role. Keep up the good editing. Chickenmonkey 12:43, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hmmm...trying to get used to this interface. Thanks for your comments, and well done on the re-write. It truly makes a lot more sense now. Wikipedia is great!
- It takes some getting used to, but you'll get it. You're welcome, and thanks. Chickenmonkey 12:59, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I have a question...
[edit]Hi ChickenMonkey,
I gather you are a moderator or something? Can I ask a question please?
I tried to add a whole section on film director David Lynch as there was nothing about his designing etc, and a Parisian nightclub has just opened based on his designs. Also some earlier design work he did for one of his films.
I spent a bit of time gathering my information and including citations and hyperlinks etc (I was only 45 mins or so), but since I started someone else had typed 'big red balls' which caused it not to save. I was only in the 'sandbox' so I didn't think it would upload when I hit save but it clashed anyway. I looked back on the page and it's revisions but couldn't find that remark anywhere. Why did it clash with mine? Also when I exited it didn't seem to store my revision, but that's OK because I copied it into a word document on my desk top. Hopefully the formatting will remain when I bring it back - perhaps I should have put it in a text editor instead.
I also think it appropriate to add it under a new heading of 'Design' in Section 3 ('Other Art'), but am unsure how to create a new block of text that has it's own 'edit' functionality, and chapter link at the top of the page.
Sorry to bug you with the questions but I'm quite enjoying having some input.
Also BTW I'm in New Zealand and this club has nothing to do with me whatsoever.
Many thanks,
Simonzzz (talk) 11:29, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Oh I'm back. I have put my text in my sandbox. I'd like to insert it if that's OK with you. I just need to figure out this 'reflist'. Leave it to me to do please, if you don't mind as I'm quite enjoying figuring it out, but I welcome your comments.
Kind regards
Simonzzz (talk) 12:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm actually not a moderator, but you're still welcome to ask me questions--I can't promise that I'll be able to answer all questions; if I can't, I'll try to point you to someone that can.
- I'm not sure where you're indicating that the "big red balls" thing occurred, but it seems you experienced an edit conflict. When that happens, you will arrive at a second "edit" page, where you will need to insert your text, again, before saving. Help:Edit conflict does a very good job of explaining this better than I could.
- I took a look at your sandbox and your text on Lynch's design work looks good. This will help explain to you how to incorporate subsection headings. "Reflist" allows an article to list the references in a single place. David Lynch already contains "reflist", so you can just add your text to that article, and it will handle that. Hope I have been of some help. Chickenmonkey 16:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks...I'll get to it in the next day or two.
Simonzzz (talk) 22:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
A question about my profile
[edit]Hi Chickenmoney.
Sorry to bother you again, but you were most helpful before. I'm wanting to alter my profile name as I use Simonzzz for lots of other things and I notice that a google search on it brings up my Wikipedia user page. I also notice that most contributors have what looks like a IP address as their username. Can you explain if I can change my profile name that is used for editing (and btw I have been doing more small changes). It is great to 'have the power'..lol
Simonzzz (talk) 12:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- It is possible to have your username changed. Visit WP:RENAME, to read about the process.
- If you wish to stop Google from indexing your user page, you could use Noindex; just add
__NOINDEX__to the top of your user page. This is perhaps an alternative to a username change, in your particular circumstance. This would remove your user page from Google search results, but it would still be possible for your user page to be found on mirror sites; it would be slightly less effective than a complete username change.
- I hope this information is of use to you. Chickenmonkey 13:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for your assistance. I think I will just insert the No Index function. Cheers
- Simonzzz (talk) 13:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Chickenmonkey 14:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. I saw this thread a while ago and thought I'd give __NOINDEX__ a try.
- I've had __NOINDEX__ on both my user and talk pages a few weeks now but Google still brings up those pages on searches. Any advice? SlightSmile 02:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe it's just taking a while? Sorry I can't be more help. Chickenmonkey 03:13, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited James Urbaniak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ride with the Devil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited John DiMaggio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Common Law (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Help
[edit]Hi
I Saw what you have done on John DiMaggio's page, would you do the same thing on Dee Bradley Baker's page?Reathough45 (talk) 08:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sure. It takes more time than I have, right now, but I'll get to it soon. Chickenmonkey 17:23, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
ThanksReathough45 (talk) 22:33, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 16
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Dee Bradley Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Robots (video game), Tazmanian Devil, Star Wars: The Clone Wars, Star Wars: The Clone Wars (TV series), Men in White, Teen Titans (video game), Making Fiends and No More Heroes
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Me Agian. Thank you for fixing Dee Bradley Baker's page. Would you fix the pages of George Coe, and Robin Atkin Downes?Reathough45 (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Chickenmonkey 09:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- George Coe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Matlock, Crossroads (TV series), Max Headroom, Shootdown and Bustin' Loose
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar |
| I just felt your message at User_talk:SarahNicoleTaylor was not bitey, and will help to keep them around :). Keep up with the good work, Mdann52 (talk) 23:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks! I thought it was probably a good idea to try to explain to them what happened and hopefully keep them around. Have a nice day! Chickenmonkey 00:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Zegen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adventureland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Here's a barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| This user has signed my userpage and been awarded with a barnstar. Click here to sign if you have not already. Jakob |
Thank you for signing! B. Jakob T. (talk) 05:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Glad to do it! Thanks! Chickenmonkey 05:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthony Quinn filmography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages California (film), Wild is the Wind and Lights Out (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 21:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
GSK ● talk ● contribs 21:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Alone across australia.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Alone across australia.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
30 for 30 Shorts formatting
[edit]Could you let me know where you found that it is officially 30 for 30Shorts as opposed to 30 for 30 Shorts? On the official site (espn.com/30for30), and in the press releases, it is listed with the space. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:06, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- I was going to look, and then reply to you; however, while I was looking, I decided you were right and went ahead with the fix of my mistake. What made me think the format of the title was 30 for 30Shorts is the title given to the webpage at espn.go.com/30for30/shorts. You'll notice the title of that webpage is 30 for 30Shorts Index; when I was filling the reference from that page, I grabbed that title for the reference and assumed that was the way they chose to stylize the title. Since it is stylized 30 for 30 Shorts elsewhere, it makes more sense to assume the title of the webpage is just a typo, so I corrected my error. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Chickenmonkey 22:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sure thing. I can see how you thought it was without the space. I also wanted to make sure that I was not missing anything myself. But yes, I think that is just a typo in the title. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Template:Rough Draft Studios has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Alone across australia.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Alone across australia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 19:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
if you might...
[edit]There is a deletion discussion about the article The Pixar Theory and the topic seems to have met the GNG though a lot of (recent) coverage.... BUT my own research indicates the the base concept of "The Pixar Universe" has been recognized in media at least as early as 2003, making this later "theory" notable only in it making enough recent waves to be considered a "viral meme". Toward addressing the earlier concept, I began work on User:MichaelQSchmidt/The Pixar Universe, but upon further reflection, perhaps best that my little sourced article might best be folded into the main topic Pixar so that we'd have a suitable redirect target for The Pixar Theory? Think it worth doing? And would you care to assist? Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 23:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pawn Shop Chronicles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Gibb and Kevin Rankin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Chickenmonkey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chickenmonkey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |