User talk:Chuckg93

This is Chuckg93's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Pollack has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Pollack. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Pollack has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Pollack. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 7. You may !vote for deletion of the redirect, which is preventing acceptance. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Chuckg93, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Rolleygiacalone per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rolleygiacalone. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chuckg93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. I only joined Wikipedia very recently with the goal of making a page for songwriter Michael Pollack. Pollack is someone close to me in real life and I have not been paid by them to do this. I have since acted in good faith and have added real, sourceable content to the best of my ability on both Pollack's page and other musicians and artists.

Decline reason:

Mr. Pollack or others like you seem to want to do the same thing; this is either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chuckg93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why this has even happened. I have acted in good faith and have never had an account before and am not acting under any false pretenses. I'm very surprised at this treatment. I put time and effort into the additions I made to this site.

Decline reason:

Editing pattern matches that of previously blocked users. only (talk) 00:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.