User talk:D-Katana

New article creation request

Hello D-Katana,

I am a Taiwanese and I substantially edited the 2 articles "Chu Mei-feng" and "Tseng Chung-ming" from 60.248.60.118 and 61.223.XXX.XXX. I would like to thank you very much for your kind creating the "Tseng Chung-ming" article for me. I just finished another new article, "Taipei First Girls' High School" and it is currently archived in Articles_for_creation/2006-08-29. As a Taiwanese, I know this school and many of its alumni very well. I am sorry to take this liberty to ask you to review my this article and if it's qualified, please bother to create it. Sincere appreciation first.

2150

Well, I didn't play 2150, and I just bought 2160, so I can't really say much about it. I still like the first one, 2140, the most. I live in Poland and it was fairly popular around here. Ausir 22:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. February 1980, The Earl of Beaconsfield, SqueakBox 01:07, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

No, no. It was a pub, then they knocked it down in 81 to make way for a waitrose, SqueakBox 01:17, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Elder Scrolls screenshots

I've got some screenshots from Morrowind, although at the moment I lack a graphic programme to edit them. If I can get hold of one anytime soon, I'll upload the images to the commons. My graphic card is o.k., so if you need other screenshots from MW or Oblivion, I'll be happy to take them. Cheers - Something Wicked 21:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man

Hey, yeh, took me a while fixing up that Orsinium article. Just to let you know I'll be happy to expand anymore stubs or whatnot and I'll definitley keep the TES lore pages updated. Later. HK51 20:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VfD - Jamie Kane

Please explain your vote on Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Jamie_Kane. In what ways is it marketing? It is in line with other Wikipedia articles such as Flying Spaghetti Monster or a talk-show Countdown (game show). They could be considered marketing too but are generally seen by most editors as representing accurate, useful information. By the way, generally it is expected of users to sign their posts on a talk page. Cheers. --Mintchocicecream 00:42, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply and your explanation. Many comments did not contain any explanation, so thank you for taking the time to explain your vote. However, I would disagree with your analysis, as Cog Rog is about a viral marketing campaign for Burger King whereas Jamie Kane was argued to be a viral marketing campaign in its own right - which isn't true as the BBC (a public service provider) neither authorized the change nor was it meant to be part of a marketing campaign [1]. Thus I would argue the page about Jamie Kane is better compared to pages about other online games or internet phenomenon, of which Wikipedia has many. In any case, Wikipedia is not targeted specifically at 14-18 year old girls and would have made a very poor place to advertise anyway. --Mintchocicecream 09:59, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Reply) A demographic survey of Wikipedia users would certainly be interesting. :) --Mintchocicecream 01:59, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cultivation

Go for it, SqueakBox 00:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks & palaver

Thanks for the compliment! I have Wind Waker and I enjoy it, though I've not gotten terribly far yet; in my humble opinion, it is a markedly unchildish gesture to be unconcerned about how a graphical style reflects on one's self-image. I use Gentoo Linux and I have it installed on several boxes, though this particular one is dual-boot and mostly runs XP SP2. Andre (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arklay mansion

Are you referring to the Spencer Mansion? If its the same, then make a redirect to the spencer mansion. Thunderbrand 22:31, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Strap-on dildo

Just to let you know, I responded to your comments on my talk page... thankies! Bushytails 21:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the Forgotten Realms project

Hi,

We are working on a Forgotten Realms Project to map Toril (mostly Faerûn, at the present). Since you contributed quite a lot on a Forgotten Realms-specific entry, I'd like to invite you to join the project, so we could improve the “Mapping the Realms” project.

The goal is to create a sort of World Factbook for the Realms. This means:

A consistent content
Use of templates
Entries should be limited to “sovereign places”: states and free cities, as well a moderately-inhabited place such as the Western Highlands.

On top of this, we also plan to cover Lost Empires, such as Pelvuria or Imaskar and, of course, Netheril

The project is located here
The Geographical index of Toril is a good start to get a visual of had been done, as well as the Halruaa entry.

Main contributors are presently

If you know some other person who would be interested, feel free to forward the invitation!

Feel free to take a look. We hope to see you soon mapping the Realms with us! Reply to David Latapie 12:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Open Hand

I came across Open Hand via The Dream (album) when I was working on what is now The Dream with Roy and HG. Would you be able to indicate whether they are notable enough to be included in wikipedia? How many copies of their albums have been sold? Thanks, Andjam 02:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe artists should be included or excluded from Wikipedia based on their album sales. With two albums now released, activity on the tour circuit as well as being likely to release material in the future I'd say they merit a position on Wikipedia, their albums included. The users who have edited the pages seem to agree with this viewpoint. I will soon edit both album pages to include the cover art, and more comprehensive information thereby removing their stub status. Obviously however, all of their articles need expanding, and any assistance is appreciated. Thank you for your question! -- D-Katana 00:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further, you only need look at the Trustkill article to see how many of their minor bands already have respective articles. -- D-Katana 00:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As well as needing more information, it needs to be cleaned up. Currently, the only mentions listed of Open Hand are by the label, a promotional site and myspace. The article has weasel words such as "hailed as a significant record in the intelligent emo subgenre" (by whom?) and "which many see" and "some comparing the album to famed bands like ...". Andjam 01:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Truly. I believe some magazines have reviewed the band's work, Total Guitar and such. Citing that source would likely help. -- D-Katana 01:45, 19 April 2006

Forgotten Realms Project

Hi,

Of course, we need every hand we may have. Any information regarding places is welcomed. We especially need informations on place that are currently only displayed on a multi-country page, like, say, Erlkazar. The address of the project is WikiProjet: Forgotten Realms and you can get a synoptic table at Geographical index of Toril.

Bienvenu dans les Royaumes ! ;-)

Reply to David Latapie 03:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marijuana Wiki

Hi there,

I see that you are a pro-Cannabis Wikipedian so I hope this will be of some interest to you.

I've started a Marijuana wiki (aka The Sticky Wiki) which I think you might be interested in. I'm hoping you can help me get started with this project. Whereas lots of articles about weed get speedy-deleted on Wikipedia, they would be totally cool over at MarijuanaWiki. But really I want the site to be more of a marijuana community than merely an encyclopedia.

To give you an example, I want to have city guides about where to score, find pot-friendly cafes, marijuana events, and what represents a good price in that city. Etc. (You can check out the featured article: "Toronto" to see what I mean). I also want to have grow diaries and marijuana blogs. All in all, basically more communal than encyclopedic.

I am in need of admins/moderators, and people experienced with MediaWiki to help build policy, categories, and templates, etc. If you'd be interested in helping me with this project, the URL is MarijuanaWiki

Thanks for your time and consideration. Hope to see you there!

-- nsandwich 23:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Ordinator

Your recent edit to Ordinator was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 21:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the page was converted to the redirect to Ordinators - as the pluralistic definition is more applicable. This as opposed to an act of vandalism. Nice to see bots being so efficient! -- D-Katana 21:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP article titles are virtually always singular. See Wikipedia:Naming convention.

In general only create page titles that are in the singular, unless that noun is always in a plural form in English (such as scissors or trousers).

Since there can be a single Ordinator, the article name should be in the singular. -Will Beback 04:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Erasure singles

Hey thanks! I'm glad you found them to be informative. :-) -- eo 23:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Eurodance

Hello,

Your recent edited work has been brought to my attention and after much discussion with members and die-hard fans from the eurodance community (eurodancehits, eurodance encyclopedia, eurodance nation, eurodance usa, dance artist info, eurodance rage, and serious eurodance) people who are extremely knowledgeable regarding this music, all of us have come to a conclusion that some your edited work is incorrect and that you provided limited information and details in the article. As a passionate fan of this genre since early 90's, we must not mislead new listeners with irrelavant or insignificant fact, but rather facts that provide substantial details that are correct.

If you have any questions please contact me at karine@eurodancehits.com

To clarify; I simply cleaned up the article in extensive fashion and moved the lengthy artist list to "List of Eurodance artists" - no new information was added; and indeed some POV content was removed as per Wikipedia:NPOV. However, it is apparant the article still lacks detail and is unconcise - as such factual information and reliably cited claims as opposed to simple opinion is welcomed particularly in the first two sections. Edits from the fan community, as long as they are relevant, clear and cited , are very appreciated. -- D-Katana 12:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About The Outfields

First, sorry my poor english, because i speak spanish, i'm from Havana,Cuba. I read the article about The Outfields band, and i'm interested in. I haven't an Internet account (only access to Wikipedia as can you see) and i wish to know more about that greatful band. I have an mp3 collection of some tracks, included Voices of Babylon, All the love and a little more, and i wish to know more about their last albums. I you can help me posting anything, i will thank you at all. Goodbye!! ZorphDark

Hi!!

Thanks for your post and your comments, i'm happy with your message... i'll be in contact with U. And i'll try get through some album that you told me, but in my country we doesn't have any marketshop were buy foreign music, and i haven't and full internet access for download an mp3 album.... anyhow, thank you, ok?? bye.

"Explicit sentiment"

Talk:Robert Christgau#"explicit sentiment": looking at the history, the phrase was yours; care to clarify? - Jmabel | Talk 03:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:TaipeiFirstGirlsHS.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TaipeiFirstGirlsHS.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPA?

Sure, I'll take a look at it. Are there any criteria I should be aware of? >Radiant< 15:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise, it looks interesting. --Guinnog 20:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be well-written and nicely sourced and illustrated. I lack the expertise in the subject matter to judge on its contents. Are there any criteria I should be aware of? >Radiant< 11:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It was obviously not a CSD :) I was wondering what the criteria are for "good status", a practice with which I am not really familiar. >Radiant< 14:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Anthony M. Benis

I've nominated the article Anthony M. Benis for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Anthony M. Benis satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony M. Benis. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Anthony M. Benis during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. —Psychonaut 04:46, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: NPA personality theory

I've nominated the article NPA personality theory for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that NPA personality theory satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony M. Benis. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of NPA personality theory during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. —Psychonaut 04:46, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:TES_Oblivion_Daedroth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TES_Oblivion_Daedroth.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Winged_Twilight_Morrowind.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Winged_Twilight_Morrowind.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten Realms

Hi,

The project is in pretty bad condition. The wikia one is more dynamic, I think. Anyway, I don’t act much in these projects—don't have time.
David Latapie (✒ | @) — www 18:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Open Hand The Dream.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Open Hand The Dream.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Akatosh

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Akatosh, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Akatosh. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ordinators

Ordinators, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Ordinators satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordinators and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ordinators during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Elder Council

Elder Council, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Elder Council satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elder Council and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Elder Council during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Orsinium

Orsinium, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Orsinium satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orsinium and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Orsinium during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ghostfence

Ghostfence, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Ghostfence satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostfence and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ghostfence during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wing Commander The Price of Freedom.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wing Commander The Price of Freedom.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Athkatla

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Athkatla, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Athkatla. Deb (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Last Night a DJ saved my life album cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Last Night a DJ saved my life album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Playing the Field album cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Playing the Field album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Any Time Now album cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Any Time Now album cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bangin' album cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bangin' album cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D Benis and NPA

What happened to the NPA theory website? Is NPA theory being discussed someplace else on the Web? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puccini777 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Regulate G Funk Era.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Regulate G Funk Era.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Trustkill logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Trustkill logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Challenger II tank3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Challenger II tank3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Daggerfall Cover art.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Daggerfall Cover art.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Earth2160box.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Earth2160box.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:53, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Regulate G Funk Era.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Regulate G Funk Era.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cost of Loving album.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cost of Loving album.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suldanessellar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suldanessellar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suldanessellar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TaipeiFirstGirlsHS.jpg

The file File:TaipeiFirstGirlsHS.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]