User talk:DDRG

3RR

If you revert the Asahi Shimbun article again you will be making yourself guilty of breaking WP:3RR (read it), which means you will probably be blocked/banned temporarily from editing Wikipedia. Mackan 12:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't mark reverts as "minor edits" - they are not. See Wikipedia:Minor edits. Mackan 13:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Single purpose account

This user is a single purpose account, only used to try and discredit Asahi Shimbun (see user contributions), after the article was canvassed in a comment to this blog post (which itself was calling for meatpuppets to edit the Comfort women article) [1]. Mackan 11:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing personal attack with false reason. Those were written at least in last year. Stop parsonal attacking. You are faffing my translation tasks. It's a holding action for Wikipedia community DDRG 11:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Are you a teacher of moral education?

No, a teacher of the English language -- so I know when it's being misused, as you are doing.

Provide a (semi-)coherent explanation of your actions on the article talk page and I'll consider reverting, otherwise you're on the fast-track to Banville without any brakes. --Calton | Talk 08:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umm. Are you doing a good turn to everybody like to me??? LOL. Thanks. DDRG

Hey DDRG, don't worry, Calton can ban you no more than he can ban me. He is not an admin. If you need some help with your article, please let me know and I will be glad to help. - SVRTVDude ^{(Yell - Toil)} 16:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orangemonster, are you stalking Calton or is it just the way it looks? Maybe you should do some research before you support users on the basis that they've been opposed by Calton. This user is an extremely disruptive single purpose account. Mackan 19:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice, SVRTVDude. I will call on your help when I need it. Thanks. DDRG 18:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DDRG, I am sorry, but obviously my helping you, for whatever reason, is being frowned upon and I apologize for that. If you need help, ask User:El_C, he is an admin, who is really helpful when you are having problems and can give you a hand or point you in the right direction to someone who can. Again, my apologizes. - SVRTVDude ^{(Yell - Toil)} 20:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Never mind it. As a matter of fact, I think I can do them by myself. DDRG 20:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joji Obara

The only way there can be a resolution made regarding the nationality of Joji Obara is if you go to the talk page and discuss. You may not want to, but I will not unprotect the page until I see discussion and some progress towards consensus from all parties involved. Nishkid 64 21:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will do some of it. But I wonder "some progress towards consensus" can be made. It seems that they don't want to write it in first paragraph. So I think it will be usefull to gather some examples as some kind of second source.DDRG 21:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So if we won't agree with you there won't be a consensus? That comment shows your lack of understanding how consensus-building works. Please read up on WP:CON. Also, WP:BIO, a policy you keep on violating. Mackan 21:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your conduct that you said other side people are racist shows clearly your lack of understanding how consensus-building works. Please read up on WP:CON. Also, WP:BIO, a policy you keep on violating. DDRG 22:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block

I have blocked you from editing for 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring at Asahi Shimbun. The following reverts are 24 hours and 20 minutes from the first to the last. [2] [3] [4] [5] The three revert rule is not a license to make three reverts every day. Slow motion edit warring is still disruptive, and this requires a block to stop the disruption for other editors. In the future, please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. I strongly suggest a request for comment. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ··coel acan 04:53, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for no explanation of the reverts. But they and I who edit the article, Asahi Shinbun were givin a adjudication by AnonEMouse, and I only come into line with it, though they are not coming into line with it. Please read the note of the article. I am searching new citations for the paragraphes which were deleted. I would edit with more clarifications and accounts, if I am unblocked.DDRG 15:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

decline=As above, this does not excuse your edit warring. Yamla 15:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)(cited by DDRG 18:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Umm. What should I do, in that case they are not coming into line with a adjudication?? >User:Yamla DDRG 15:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We are "in line with a adjudication", you are not. The consensus is against including your poorly written, unsourced and biased statements in the article. Please abide by the consensus. Mackan 20:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If, you Mackan are in line with the adjudication, and I'm not. Why I abided by the adjudication? As you said, you must have abided by the adjudication. But obviously, Mackan did conducts against the adjudication and reverted them[6] and I am in line with the adjudication [7]. Mackan,you don't want to be in line with the adjudication??? Or you can't read what AnonEMouse wrote?? Or you can't read the acceptation what AnonEMouse wrote?? DDRG 23:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments

As I told your meatpuppet, unless you're prepared to be at least minimally coherent, please don't post on my Talk page. Certainly don't post incoherent fact-free attacks. --Calton | Talk 02:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't put a tag on my page after conclusion without evidence. You are a troll. Stop it first.DDRG 02:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, all I can say is, tramway flogging into my question, are you why is it thirty letters down under jelly, what is it? Oh, and have a read of this, this, this, and this. --Calton | Talk 02:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. You are a troll. I can understand it. And what? DDRG 02:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So your reading vocabulary is as limited as your written vocabulary. Got it. Once again, try this and this. To put it in simpler terms, Don't Make Shit Up. Note also that insulting my intelligence is a very bad form of persuasion. --Calton | Talk 04:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't insulted your intelligence, but accused your manner that you put a tag after judement, without evidence was made . By the way, if you can read Japansese, plaese read this[8]. I began to translate some paragraphes of it[9]. And then, I was mounted attacks by Mackan. I think he wants to hide the facts. If you can, please translate them or write the informations of Asahi Shinbun , which Westerners outside of Japan haven't known yet. DDRG 04:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Mackan is a 2ch meatpuppet "of another side", because he could put many links to 2ch. Who can do such things but of a 2ch meatpuppet??

That statement doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. --Calton | Talk 22:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know 2ch is merely a simple, huge BB ?? He has a thorough knowledge of 2ch.DDRG 23:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DDRG, stop embarrasing yourself. I've been around on this Wikipedia since February 2006, and I registered my account in the same name on the jp-wiki the month before that. I've made over 2500 edits on the English Wiki alone. Suggesting I'm a 2ch meatpuppet is ridiculous and just shows you have no idea what the word "meat puppet" actually means. Mackan 23:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mackan. You have a thorough knowledge of 2ch, and you denoted your knowledge, as your many citations from such a huge BB. Your achievements are over what can be done by first-time visitor of the BB. DDRG 23:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours, since you have been edit warring on Joji Obara with no attempt to discuss your edits on the article's talk page. --Akhilleus (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]