User talk:Djkizza

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, 100+ Club, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --TREYWiki 01:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with 100+ Club. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --TREYWiki 01:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand why it was deleted, and the speedy deletion thing said to delete the notice if you are editing the article, which I was. So I did.

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Example.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:QCCN logo.JPG. The copy called Image:QCCN logo.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 02:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Queensland Community Care Network

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Queensland Community Care Network article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Remember also that articles need to demonstrate that their subjects are notable using third-party references. --Eastmain 05:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the original article had been taken from http://www.qccn.org.au/ I was pleased to see, however, that another editor has rewritten the article, so that there is no longer a copyright problem. --Eastmain 19:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:JoyOfTeenSex.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JoyOfTeenSex.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have edited it to include the rationale, I put it in the image summary and discussion as I wasn't sure where it was supposed to go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.237.14 (talk) 23:31, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]