User talk:Erik Jesse

CHU-poster

It looks fine to me. If it is not, you will be alerted by an editor specialized in copyright, before it is deleted. BTW cool that you have been editing the Dutch parties articles I radically revised. C mon 12:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! --E.J. 12:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Petri Krohn's behaviour

Thank you for your interest in topics regarding the Baltic republics and the Soviet occupation. This interests has undoubtedly familiarised you with tactics and behaviour of Petri Krohn.

I have prepared a thorough overview of these tactics, along with references to related Wikipedia policy, and posted it to his userpage, requesting that he stop such activities, especially representing private alternative histories on Wikipedia as thought they were fact.

Unfortunately, he proceeded to delete the request mere seven minutes later, along with an inflammatory edit summary. I do not believe this to have been a proper reaction.

Please, if that will not be too inconvenient, take a look at the situation, evaluate it, and consider expressing your evaluation in the appropriate manner.

Many thanks, Digwuren 16:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A sound plan; selles on Sul minu moraalne toetus.E.J. 12:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to calls to this effect on the talk page, I'm moving forward with the WP:RFC/U with only the last six weeks worth of edits fully classified. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Petri Krohn, which, after minor editing and addition of the most recent 'interesting' diffs, is supposed to become the main RFC around 21:00 UTC tonight. If there are reasons barring you from endorsing the current summary, I would like to learn about them as soon as possible so the main summary can be endorsed by as wide a coalition as possible.

Thanks in advance. Digwuren 15:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newcomer

RJ CG ei ole päris uustulnukas; see on 206.186.8.130 uus kasutajanimi. AFAIK tegeleb ta peaasjalikult vatramisega, et Eestis on palju natse, mõned neist linnapead ja teised jälle panevad kujusid üles -- ja seega on tema senist tegevust peaasjalikult Lihula monumendist rääkiva artikli juures näha. Mõnda aega arvasin ma, et ta on ise Kanada neonats, kes üritab oma seisukohta Kaugele Tundmatule Meretagusele Maale(tm) viidates auväärsema ja meinstriimsemana paista lasta, aga viimasel ajal on ilmnenud asjaolud, mis lubavad selle hüpoteesi paikapidavuses kahelda. Digwuren 13:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I see. On this basis - if our way of thinking were similar to that of PK's - we could ask for CheckUser/Petri Krohn.E.J. 13:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFC/U on Petri Krohn filed

You might be interested to know that Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Petri Krohn has been filed. Digwuren 20:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on the Petri Krohn RFC

Your comment in the Beatle Fab Four section has been removed three times now. Please stop putting it back. Read the instructions and try to help keep the RFC readable. Comment on the talkpage, or create an Outside view of your own. Bishonen | talk 09:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yes, I noticed that my first comment was removed; today, I added the second one but have not re-added it once it got deleted. But do you also suggest a guideline or is it another idea of your own? E.J. 11:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me of that; I see someone else made the necessary modification. Biruitorul 21:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more respectful to the sysops of Bishonen's standing. It's in your own interest to stop antagonizing them. --Ghirla^-трёп- 21:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind advice, Andrey; I'll try to be more patient. Your blocklog is a fair specimen for what may follow, if one doesn't. E.J. 11:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My blocklog is a fair specimen of what may follow unfair blocks, as some of the blocking admins were rather quickly desysopped after that. None of them remotely approaches Bishonen in good standing and respect. You should be aware that unwarranted appellations to block logs may be viewed as harrassment, however. --Ghirla^-трёп- 18:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that being said, monsieur, I hope we can consider this debate to be finished. E.J. 11:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Essay on how 3RR hurts the project and a proposal to fix it.

Hi! I would appreciate it, if you could give me your thoughts on this essay: Accusations of collaboration: 3RR hurts Wikipedia --Alexia Death the Grey 09:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ArbComBot 00:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've now also been named as a party. Cbrown1023 talk 23:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Estonian Americans.

Tere Erik Jesse, the List of Estonian Americans has been nominated for deletion. I thought perhaps you may wish to weigh in on this matter, as nearly every other American ethnic group is not listed for deletion. Cheers, ExRat 01:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Among the principles passed was At wit's end which states that necessary measures must be adopted by the Arbitration Committee in cases where repeated attempts to stop disruptive disputes have failed. As a result of the case, both Digwuren and Petri Krohn are banned for one year. There has also been a general restriction to all editors working on topis related to Eastern Europe and a warning to all those who may, in the future, attempt to use Wikipedia as a battleground that they may be banned when the matter is reported to the Committee. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 18:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gohar Markosjan-Käsper

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Gohar Markosjan-Käsper. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gohar Markosjan-Käsper. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification motion

A case (Eastern Europe) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick (Talk) 15:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CHU1946.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CHU1946.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]