User talk:GAV80

Welcome!

Hello, GAV80! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2002 FIFA World Cup disciplinary record, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnus Svensson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spain squad list

As I said at the summary, "See official squad list". The official squad list should be refer to the list which available at fifa.com, that is the one of 2010 and 2014. For me, I'd use the "Shirt Name", so there is an "I" before Casillas, which could be ignored. The reason is it is easier for refer. Just it. However, as to date, I only have time to do Spain squad list for 2010 and 2014, there's a future plan to do other templates. Raymond "Giggs" Ko 07:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very welcome. I should not have reason to prevent. However, only FIFA could be regarded, as there is no official squad list backup for UEFA European Championship. Raymond "Giggs" Ko 17:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1990 FIFA World Cup Final

The 1990 World Cup Final was Argentina v West Germany; I've the Panini Album and the local team was the winner of first semi-final (played on July 3, 1990). --151.65.191.157 (talk) 07:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round

Okay, I will explain it to you very carefully.

Odd were unseeded at QR1 but they defeated Sheriff Tiraspol. So Odd took Sheriff's coefficient at QR2 (as it had already been drawn) and there they were seeded and defeated Shamrock Rovers. Therefore, no italics for Odd;
Nõmme Kalju were unseeded at QR1 but they defeated Aktobe. So Nõmme took Aktobe's coefficient at QR2 and there they were seeded but were defeated by Vaduz, who will take Nõmme's already improved coefficient. Therefore, italics for Vaduz;
Ferencváros were unseeded at QR1 but they defeated Go Ahead Eagles. So Ferencváros took Go Ahead Eagles' coefficient at QR2 and there they were seeded but were defeated by Željezničar, who will take Ferencváros' already improved coefficient. Therefore, italics for Željezničar.

Hope I've been clear enough. If you have any questions, you can ask me at my talk page. The Replicator (talk) 23:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, I was wrong. Qed237 corrected me. I'm sorry if I confused you, you were right, QR1 doesn't matter anymore. The Replicator (talk) 23:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Water polo at the 2015 World Aquatics Championships – Men's tournament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mann. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Time of matches in Group C (2016 AFC U-19 Championship qualification‎)

From the schedule page: [1], it says: "16:00, 19:00, 17:00, 17:00". I searched twitter for the results of the first round of matches, and the second match should end on 18:00 GMT: [2], so this suggests it started at 19:00 UTC+3. Chanheigeorge (talk) 22:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it was AFC's mistake, not your mistake. Chanheigeorge (talk) 22:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for edits in "2017 UEFA European Under-21 Championship qualification"

@Skyblueshaun: and @Chanheigeorge:.

Thank you for your edits in "2017 UEFA European Under-21 Championship qualification".

SUPER!!! GAV80 – "Tables", Skyblueshaun – "Results", Chanheigeorge – "Goalscorers".

Will we continue tomorrow? )))

GAV80 (talk) 18:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Standings

Hi, just a quick question. When teams have same points and same on tiebreaker, like Colombia and Uruguay in Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONMEBOL table, do you think we should display them both as first (pos = 1)? And should thaqt also be the case for table where matches has not yet started? Qed237 (talk) 22:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Qed237:. I think so: each place for each teams, all places and positions are different. If teams same on tiebreak, then who played first, in the table must be above, because it is like "a repeating record".

In CONMEBOL:

1st match: Bolivia – Uruguay 0–2; 2nd match: Columbia – Peru 2–0; 3rd match: Venezuela – Paraguay 0–1; 4th match: Chile – Brazil 2–0; 5th match: Argentina – Ecuador 0–2.

In my opinion: 1) URU, 2) COL; 3) CHI, 4) ECU, 5) PAR; 6) VEN; 7) BOL, 8) PER; 9) BRA; 10) ARG.

I think it's better than just alphabetically.

In table where matches has not yet started: alphabetically or by ranking.

P.S. I don't know very well English. I translated from my native language through an online translator. But I think that the meaning will be clear. GAV80 (talk) 05:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are saying and it makes sense, but I dont think you understand my question. I meant should it be

Alternative 1: 1) CHI 2) COL; 3) ECU, 4) URU, 5) PAR; 6) VEN; 7) ARG, 8) BOL; 9) BRA; 10) PER.

Alternative 2: 1) CHI 1) COL; 1) ECU, 1) URU, 5) PAR; 6) VEN; 7) ARG, 7) BOL; 7) BRA; 7) PER.

I still think we should list the alphabetically, but there is a possibility to give them the same position number. Qed237 (talk) 12:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Team positions in team tables. Qed237 (talk) 13:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Football EURO

Chaval, you have not fu***ng idea about the classification process, Turkey can't be the best third here and at Mars! when you think it could be possible, then you're not from this galaxy. I will not modify it, I have much more important things to do in other projects, maybe you put your feet once at the Earth and modify it. Happy live! Leonprimer (talk) 22:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Leonprimer Calm down, Turkey can still reach 16 points in third-placed team ranking if Latvia finish in sixth place. Please see Talk:UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying#Current third place possibilities and stop with the peronal attacks. Qed237 (talk) 23:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hungary

Hi, why did you revert my edit? Explain to me mathematically how any team can finish in third place with a better record than Hungary please. Officially Mr X (talk) 20:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If Turkey and Kazakhstan win tomorrow, Turkey will be best 3rd with 16 pts. Zirath (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Women's 2017 EURO Qualifiying

Hello,

There seems to be a misunderstanding regarding ENG and BEL position at group 7 and it is important we clarify any issues. There are 4 teams (ENG, BEL, SRB, BIH) with 3 points at this moment. And so far the only match any of these four teams played against each other is BEL 6–0 BIH, a result which ensures BEL above BIH on the table, but not above ENG or SRB (as they haven't played each other yet). Until these other matches happen, the criteria to determine the group positions starts with overall goal difference (ENG +8, BEL +6, SRB +1, BIH -2). You edits were BEL appears as top of the group are now in contradiction with the source cited (UEFA) for those tables. You can check the official UEFA table on the link http://www.uefa.com/womenseuro/season=2017/standings/index.html

I have already modified your revisions to reflect the source accurately but you undid them and I would like to avoid a war editing. Please revert your edits.

Thank you. 94.210.159.131 (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

UEFA's site don't use Head-to-head until all matches finish. For example, Champions League 2015/2016 Group F. Here Arsenal 3rd and Dinamo Zagreb 4th. But Dinamo Zagreb won Arsenal 2–1. This is wrong. Right table: Group F.

Here, in Wikipedia use tiebreak criterias immediately. GAV80 (talk) 17:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Women's 2017 EURO Qualifiying - Tiebreaker rule

Hello,

I noticed you revert my change on group 3 as well. Please notice the tiebreaker rule is used only when the group is finished. Here are the rules:

If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of a group, the following tie-breaking criteria are applied, in the order given, to determine the rankings:

1.Higher number of points obtained in the mini-tournament or group matches played among the teams in question;
2.Superior goal difference resulting from the mini-tournament or group matches played among the teams in question;
3.Higher number of goals scored in the mini-tournament or group matches played among the teams in question;
4.(Applied to qualifying group stage only) Higher number of goals scored away from home in the group matches played among the teams in question;
5.If, after having applied criteria 1 to 4, teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1 to 4 are reapplied exclusively to the mini-tournament or group matches between the teams in question to determine their final rankings. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 6 to 11 apply;
6.Superior goal difference in all mini-tournament or group matches;
7.Higher number of goals scored in all mini-tournament or group matches;
8.(Applied to qualifying group stage only) Higher number of away goals scored in all group matches;
9.(Applied to preliminary round only) If only two teams have the same number of points, and they are tied according to criteria 1 to 7 after having met in the last round of the mini-tournament, their rankings are determined by a penalty shoot-out (not used if more than two teams have the same number of points, or if their rankings are not relevant for qualification for the next stage).
10.Lower disciplinary points total based only on yellow and red cards received in the mini-tournament or group matches (red card = 3 points, yellow card = 1 point, expulsion for two yellow cards in one match = 3 points);
11.Position in the UEFA women's national team coefficient ranking for the preliminary round or qualifying group stage draw.

Until the groups are completed, the usual rules apply (overall goal difference and goals scored).

Please fix the group 3 and 7 tables as per source (UEFA) http://www.uefa.com/womenseuro/season=2017/standings/index.html and the ranking of second-placed teams eliminating any contradictions.

Thank you,

94.210.159.131 (talk) 17:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but no. Only you think that these tables are wrong. GAV80 (talk) 18:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 UEFA Futsal Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilhelm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WC 1998: Argentina - England

Hi. I've just rewatched the game and noticed that the argentina's defender positions were wrong, so I corrected them. I don't know why you reverted my changes... did you watch the game on these days too? It's on Youtube, Zanetti played as RB (Vivas CB and Chamot LB) contrary to what was written in Wikipedia.

Also I'm from Argentina and I know these players played in those positions for the most part in their careers.

I hope the changes stayed as I corrected them, because that is what happened.

Excuse me for my english, I hope you understand me. Goodbye! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocowainfeld (talk • contribs) 22:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would like to ask about your edit in 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round. What differs from ? Because their displays are apparently the same, I always use the former, which is shorter. Thanks :) Centaur271188 (talk) 19:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Centaur271188:.   for HTML.   for XHTML. XHTML is newer than HTML. GAV80 (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now I get it. Are there any problems for XHTML users when we use ? Centaur271188 (talk) 19:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Centaur271188: I don't know. ))) I have not tested it. GAV80 (talk) 19:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK :) Thanks again. Centaur271188 (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ranking of Runners-up and fourth-placed teams AFC

Hi, just wanted to inform you that after I made the coeffients calculations with highest and lowest possible rank I moved on to a new project. This time I changed language and made a C++ programme that calculates all possible scenarios and determines the highest and lowest possible points for every positions for all teams, both with and without the last-placed team. This can be used to determine what teams may not reach World Cup and who has secured World Cup, or at least third round of Asian Cup. You can currently see the result at User:Qed237/sandbox5. If you have any questions about this or ideas of more that I can do please let me know. Qed237 (talk) 00:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Qed237:. Good tables. I checked tables. I found one error. In Group A: Total Highest Points in Fourth-placed table must be 9 points. Also 9 points in Total table. GAV80 (talk) 07:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that was a big mistake, not sure how I could have missed that when just maing a summary of the column. Thanks for spotting it. Qed237 (talk) 11:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix the CONCACAF's Group C

Guatemala is erroneously credited with a win over Trinidad and Tobago and in second place. They should be in third place with a minus 1 goal differential.

B575(talk) 15:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@B575: I see nothing wrong with that table. Guatemala is ahead on goal difference. What is wrong? Qed237 (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guatemala lost to Trinidad and Tobago 1-2 and should show 0 points and a -1 in goal differential. I was trying to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B575 (talk • contribs)

@B575: Then they defeated St. Vincent with 4-0 and got 3 points and +3 in goal differential. You might want to take a closer look to the table. Qed237 (talk) 22:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 UEFA Futsal Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Igor and Joan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2017–18 UEFA Europa League

Hi, regarding this edit have you done the math manually or have you looked at User:Qed237/sandbox3#Coefficient table. I thought we were supposed to wait with my table until after group stage when the math can be done fairly easy manually to chack that my table is correct (which I strongly believe). Qed237 (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Qed237:. I calculated same table manually, and then checked with your table. No errors in tables. Both tables is correct. In your Talkpage on 31 October 2015: "Let's wait matches next week". So I thought, may make changes. GAV80 (talk) 04:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great. No problem, you can make the changes. A lot more can be made after group stage has been completed. Qed237 (talk) 11:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

31.176

Hi again, hope you had a nice weekend.

I saw that you reverted 31.176 again, and I just wanted to inform you that I made a report to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#New rangeblock request for 31.176 (blocked last time but now returned). Since it is a dynamic IP (it changes) blocking just one IP-adress wont work, as the editor will edit on a new IP-adress, but last time an admin could blocked the entire range of that editor and hopefully this can be done again. If you have more problem with this editor just let me know or you can add to my report (or file a new report if mine has been archieved) so that this can stop. Qed237 (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The IP range now blocked for one month. Qed237 (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Qed237:, thank you for your help. GAV80 (talk) 17:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijan Cup

Can you please create more seasons in Azerbaijan Cup ? There a few redlinks. Thank you. I did the main page, and I will help a bit, if you are from there you should improve your country. Thank you.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 20:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CHAN

http://www.newvision.co.ug/new_vision/news/1415236/chan-2016-mali-uganda https://www.supersport.com/football/chan-2016/news/160119/Mali_come_twice_from_behind_to_hold_Uganda http://www.kawowo.com/index.php/football/item/24861-uganda-mali-in-four-goal-thriller-chan-2016.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvkdgZmj9Bg&index=13&list=PL79m9Jm7_jmB03WmfDO86otKe3aO6aoal 00:28

Sorry to change the text. The goal does the number 11. The number 7 (ochava) doesn't intervene. I was watching the game. The goal was a bad report of the CAF. 181.14.118.234 (talk) 23:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@181.14.118.234:, Thank you! GAV80 (talk) 18:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Handball

Heya, yeah the editor was just copying everything from the last edition. Fixed it. Kante4 (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Goalscorers in "2016 African Nations Championship"

To verify the goalscorers, you can check the videos at the CAF Youtube channel: [3]. Chanheigeorge (talk) 07:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chanheigeorge:. Thank you. I will watch this channel later. GAV80 (talk) 07:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eurocups knockout phase start

@Qed237:, @The Replicator:, @Chanheigeorge:, @Kante4:.

Congratulations on the start of 2015–16 Eurocups knockout phase!

GAV80 (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Association ranking tables

Hi, I just realised that while 90% is good to avoid breaks between flags and team name I really dont like to make text smaller. Do you think we should reduce the amount of columns and just have two columns instead? Just an idea, perhaps we should open a discussion about it. Qed237 (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Qed237:. Now I don't know. I will think. GAV80 (talk) 12:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Div col

Hey, because it's useless when 1 or 2 have scored. When there are three, it's perfectely fine. Why add something with no usage? Kante4 (talk) 21:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still does not change the fact that it's useless without 3 scorers. Kante4 (talk) 21:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but it's named "3", so it should display 3. 2 looks odd, very odd. Kante4 (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Sportsfan 1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsfan 1234:, sorry. I did not see that you moved template page. GAV80 (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2019 AFC Asian Cup qualification

Hi GAV80. The other day you deleted the Philippines from the third round qualified teams section which I initially added. Why? Unless I'm missing something, they've already qualified for the third round. Even if they lose their final game against North Korea and regardless of what happens in the other fixtures, worst case scenario is they'll finish fourth in the fourth placed ranked teams. InternacionalFutbolista (talk) 22:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @InternacionalFutbolista:. Maybe teams from Groups A, B, D and G above PHI in fourth placed ranked teams. PHI maybe 5th in fourth placed ranked teams. GAV80 (talk) 06:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right, Group A! My thinking was only with regards to Myanmar and Tajikistan. Timor-Leste has an outside chance. Group D doesn't count anymore. Guam have played all their games while India finish fifth even if they win their final game. Thanks. InternacionalFutbolista (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Victorien Adebayor

Hi GAV80. Could you please move Adebayor Zakari Adje to his common name Victorien Adebayor. "Adebayor" is his surname not first/given name. I don't have this privilege yet. Thanks. InternacionalFutbolista (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @InternacionalFutbolista:. Sorry, but I don't know how move pages to other names. Maybe another user help you with that. GAV80 (talk) 17:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Width

Hi, I just saw your edit to Handball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament modifying the width of the bracket to 180 (from default 170). That made me think about the Module:Sports table and saw that the width is standard 190. What should be the standard width?`Qed237 (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Qed237:. I choose 190 or 200 for team-width. On page 2015–16 UEFA Futsal Cup, User:Chanheigeorge increased team-width to 200, so I think that 200 better in both modules. GAV80 (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually thinking to go with the 180 as standard. We often use 200 when team names are long, but not as standard. In your futsal example, teams like "Cardiff University Futsal Club" have a very long name so we make all tables wider so that they have the same size to match the long names. Qed237 (talk) 09:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spain in UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying

I am checking the math of whether Spain will definitely finish as the best 6 runners-up in UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying, I will inform you later. Chanheigeorge (talk) 06:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Spain are currently only guaranteed 12 runners-up points, since Republic of Ireland can still finish last in Group 2. Only the Group 3 runners-up are guaranteed to finish with fewer than 12 points. So Spain still have not qualified, but will qualify later this week if Montengro do not beat Republic of Ireland by five goals or more (this way Montenegro are guaranteed to finish last and Spain are guaranteed 15 runners-up points). It may even be possible that they qualify earlier depending on results of other groups, although I have not checked thoroughly. Chanheigeorge (talk) 06:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Group-2: Spain: 18-6 ptos (not counting results against fifth-placed team) => 12 ptos
Group-3: UKR/ROM: ........................................................ => 10 ptos
Group-5: RUS/HUN:......................................................... => 11 ptos

@81.172.65.201: You are wrong. RUS maybe 13 points. GAV80 (talk) 08:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

6 June 2016: Acorrding to the RFEF "España disputará la tercera Eurocopa de su historia" (Spain have qualified for the European Championships for the third time in their history) http://www.sefutbol.com/espana-disputara-tercera-eurocopa-su-historia

Hello, @Vanherboal:. They are wrong. ESP maybe on 2nd place in Group B with 12 points. And 6 other groups maybe with 2nd place with 12 points. ESP will go to play-off and will lose there. No qualification. Early now for Q. GAV80 (talk) 09:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... They say that ESP maybe on 2nd place in Group-2 with 15 ptos (18-3) because Spain women's national team have played only match Montenegro... but IRL could still be the last, couldn't it?

Yes, now IRL maybe on last place in Group B and then ESP has only 12 points. But after today matches ESP will be qualified with 99,99%. GAV80 (talk) 10:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think England qualifies already? They now have 13 runners-up points (with Estonia guaranteed last), and at least Groups 3 and Groups 6 can attain maximum of only 12 runners-up points. Chanheigeorge (talk) 17:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chanheigeorge:. Yes, you are right. Will you can add ENG to qualified teams? GAV80 (talk) 17:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chanheigeorge:. In Group 6 NIR maybe on 1st place on head-to-head tiebreak. GAV80 (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, didn't notice that! Chanheigeorge (talk) 17:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Norway qualifies. Either Kazakhstan or Israel will finish last in Group 8, no matter which team Norway are guaranteed at least 13 runners-up points. Chanheigeorge (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chanheigeorge:. Again I am agree with you. GAV80 (talk) 18:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chanheigeorge:. We forgot one case. ))) In Group 6: if NIR will win all 4 matches and SUI will lose all 2 matches, then SUI will be on 2nd place with 15 points (not 12). ENG and NOR mathematically did not qualify yet. But after half-time NIR lost CZE with 0–2. Very-very little chances for this case. GAV80 (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, thank you for spotting this. Chanheigeorge (talk) 18:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chanheigeorge:. Maybe better move this section to qualifying talkpage for all user, which read this? I will move. OK? GAV80 (talk) 18:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go ahead. Chanheigeorge (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia

Hey, yeah i read it today earlier (other article) but could not figure out why. Are they the best runner-up if they lose? Kante4 (talk) 10:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kante4:. I read this article EHF. There is written "Currently Slovenia is in prime position as their 24:23 win against Croatia granted them two valuable points because in the “best third ranked team”-ranking only the matches against the teams ranked first and second are taken into account."
It is mean that if Croatia will lose last match to Macedonia (and Slovenia will not lose to Montenegro), Croatia will be best third-placed team with 4 points. In other groups teams maybe only with 2 points maximum.
I will add Croatia in table of qualified teams. GAV80 (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great. Kante4 (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove gallery!

Hi. Please first, read this debate. I am waiting your answer.Sarbaze naja (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying Group 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Megan Connolly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Euro 2016

Sorry, I'm editing on my smartphone, the autocorrect tool is quite annoying. Arbero (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Arbero:. OK. It's normal. All mistaked. Thank you for your edits. GAV80 (talk) 18:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GAV80:. You are welcome. I do my best to try and avoid mistakes even though I have to admit that I can be error-prone quite often sometimes if you have noticed my previous and current edits. Arbero (talk) 18:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Euro 2016 Group C

How can Ukraine be second? Explain, please.

Hello, @Oldstone James:. GER – POL 1–0, NIR – GER 0–1, UKR – POL 3–0. That's all. UKR 2nd. GAV80 (talk)

@GAV80: Thanks! ^Ol^Ja 19:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Oldstone James: It is easy, just do the math per the example above, and read tiebreaker before making more incorrect disruptive edits. Qed237 (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Qed237: Haha! Was this really that necessary? By the way, please stop harrassing me and get out of my talk page. ^Ol^Ja 19:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Oldstone James: With weird edits like this and this and then you have the guts to attack other editors, yes it was neccesary. You have a habbit of making these incorrect edits to tables. Also no one has edited your talkpage for more than 6 months... Qed237 (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Qed237: That just proves my point: not only are you a hypocrite, but you also threaten to get me banned. Making 'weird' edits is an example of me being remiss, and such edits can easily be inverted without me having to complain (as you have seen in the example above). On the other hand, you make edits that you know are not going to do any good, attack editors, like you did just now (no one has edited your talkpage for more than 6 months - which is also silly from you, as I have barely been visiting Wikipedia in the past 6 months, duh, but nevermind), and, in addition to that, make very silly grammatical mistakes. I am not going to argue with you anymore. Bye. ^Ol^Ja 20:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Oldstone James: Then why do you say please stop harrassing me and get out of my talk page when no editor has edited your talkpage for 6 months? And stop with the namecalling and assuming bad faith. I dont edit if I dont think I am doing something better, that is just rubbish. Qed237 (talk) 20:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Euro

this user delet my useful information !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Qed237 / in all of football pages exist third place and semifinalist infromation but this user only its Taste delet important information and Threatens me. please help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uero2034 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teams in the top eight before 1980

Wales played in the "quarter finals" or "playoffs" of that tournament. Please check it on the official UEFA site. Before 1980, the top eight teams played in the quarter finals of every tournament. If the paragraph is named "top eight" we need to consider the quarter finals of the tournaments between 1960 and 1976. I have checked it on the official UEFA site: Wales played the quarter finals of the that tournament. These are the teams eliminated in quarter finals from 1960 to 1976: 1960: Austria , Romania, Portugal, Spain; 1964: Luxembourg, France, Sweden, Republic of Ireland; 1968: Bulgaria, Hungary, Spain, France; 1972: Italy, Romania, England, Yugoslavia; 1976: Wales, Soviet Union, Spain, Belgium. We need to add: Spain: 1960, 1968, 1976 (three times more) Romania: 1960, 1972 (two times more) France: 1964, 1968 (two times more) Austria, Portugal: 1960 (one time more) Sweden, Luxembourg, Republic of Ireland : 1964 (one time more) Bulgaria, Hungary: 1968 (one time) Italy, England, Yugoslavia: 1972 (one time more) Wales, Soviet Union, Belgium: 1976 (one time more). You can control it on the official UEFA site. Before 1980, UEFA chose the venue to play the semifinals and finals after the quarter finals stage. The "top eight teams" were eliminated in that stage of every tournament. Please verify it on the official UEFA site. For this reason, the table is wrong. "Top eight" is different from "top four". User:Disgusto 09:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Disgusto:. No. From 1960 to 1976 quarter-finals are not championship, this is preliminary round. See, for example, Statistics 1976, there are only 4 teams. Wales and other 3 teams (from quarter-finals) played in qualifying phase. First championships before 1980 had only 4 teams → no Top 8, only top 4.

OK, but the table is nominated "top eight", for this reason we need to modify the name of the paragraph, "top eight from 1980 and top four before 1980" for example. The format of the tournament before 1980 was different. The quarter finals were played from eight teams (and were "qualifing stage"). The difference from "top four" and "top eight" is minimum. User:Disgusto 09:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 UEFA Champions League qualifying phase and play-off round and 2016–17 UEFA Champions League qualifying phase and play-off round

See WP:REDLINK. Redlinks are for an article that should be created because the subject is notable. The subject was deemed non-notable in the deletion discussions. Please stop re-adding the red links, which encourages readers to create a new article, because the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Quigley was that the subject is non-notable. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Football at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament

I noticed, when updating the total attendance figure for the tournament after the Bronze Medal Match, that you updated the games and goals totals. Please refrain from updating the number of games played and the number of goals scored until you can update the attendance as well. Thanks!
PCN02WPS (talk) 20:49, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Second and third places

Please explain this edit, I can't get it.--User:Tomcat7 (talk) 17:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Tomcat7:. Head-to-head is a primary criteria (after points) in UEFA's competitions. Not goal difference.
In Group A: TUR win 3–2 with BLR. TUR 2nd, BLR 3rd.
in Group B: MDA won 3–0 with ENG. MDA 2nd, ENG 3rd.
You can see standings here: Official site and there clicking "Standings". GAV80 (talk) 17:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2018 FIFA World Cup qualification UEFA - Table Templates

Hi, I think we should order the teams alphabetically for tables that have been playing, because FIFA does not use pots or rankings as a tie-breaker. You can see official tables in uefa.com and fifa.com:
http://www.uefa.com/european-qualifiers/season=2018/standings/index.html
http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/preliminaries/europe/index.html
With tables are yet to play, we do not have to change anything (fifa.com still uses pots while uefa.com does not). Is it OK? :) Centaur271188 (talk) 18:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Centaur271188:. I think that pots and rankings are most sport principle, than alphabetically. And if all groups were ranked by pots before matches, then need stay also and now. GAV80 (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I share your opinion, but we should follow what sources say, even if they are somewhat unreasonable :) Centaur271188 (talk) 18:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Centaur271188:. Need wait 2 hours and will be no matter: alphabetically or by pots. ))) GAV80 (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you say, it will not matter in a few hours/days. But I would vote for alphabetically after the matches started. It is both how the sources display the tables and also what is more natural and many readers wont know about the pots now when we are in "match phase" instead of "draw phase". Qed237 (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to comment on my page

Hello, GAV80. You have new messages at LarryJeff's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

help me

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Xbeachsoccer#Comments_by_other_users — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yangwanggg (talk • contribs) 15:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi GAV80 , i am improve many article in wiki, but user "mohsen 1248" destroy it. pls help and if he destroy , you correct it. thanks a lot. artcile such as: AFC football u19, u23, u19, u16, mens and womens, beach soccer and futsal china and iran national team and others. thanks a lot. you can help me to help to in wiki :

1-i have one account
2- please check all my current edit. you cant take a evidence any vandalism for my edits.
3- in two years ago, this user "Mohsen 1248" have a conflict with a user "Parsa amoli" but i am not it.
4- i have one account now and i dont know name or password of accounts in many dates and months ago.
5- i was request and appeal for open my account and one of admin say to me: you can create a new acount six months later.
6- i am know my ban reason in past and i am know my mistakes but for one mistake should not banned one user for all! my six months banned time is end and i have i like to help wikipedia for better content and improve it. i promise dont see mistake from me and now i know rules.
7- please look at all of my current edit and you find vandalsim you ban me again and you cant find please help me to end this conflict.
8- i do apologize from past mistakes.
9- my banned time is end and noe i have only one acoount in recents time.
10- thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yangwanggg (talk • contribs) 15:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GAV80. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016-17 Champions league groupe stage: ranking in group A

Hi,

The tiebreaker is goal difference. Please see pt. 2 of "Tiebreakers" section and http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2017/standings/round=2000783/group=2004816/index.html

Bob von Schlumpfenberg (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Bob von Schlumpfenberg:. You are wrong. See Regulations page 23. Goal difference not first criteria, but only seventh. GAV80 (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake indeed. Sorry about that ! Thank you for the correction. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob von Schlumpfenberg (talk • contribs) 22:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 AFC Beach Soccer Championship

hi , table was created by me , not about group stage or number of team in each group but like to 2016 AFC U-19 Championship (table in end of article) . ranking table (for 4 top team complete after semifinal and final match), thanks. Callofworld (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Opdire657 (talk) 13:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There has been revert warring at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:GAV80 reported by User:Opdire657 (Result: ). There may still be time for you to reply and promise to wait for consensus before anyone is blocked. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @EdJohnston:. Thank you for your prompt. I answered on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. GAV80 (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So you are *not* promising to wait for consensus? EdJohnston (talk) 19:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston:, I thought the consensus already reached: I add right info to that page and nobody undid or changed it. GAV80 (talk) 19:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, when there is consensus, there is (A) at least one person who says that they agree with you, (B) there is an actual discussion somewhere that ends with an agreement. All I can see right now is a lot of reverts on the article. EdJohnston (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block

Hi. You've been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to violating to Three revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 19:27, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About my English...

Well, SuperJew seemed not to understand my latest comment in 'Formats' discussion. He said something about 'window' (no, I meant 'edit box') and 'matches' (again no, I mentioned 'items', i.e. players' names and goal templates, in goalscorers lists). Was it because of my English skills? You read that comment and thanked me, so I would like to ask. Did you have any trouble comprehending my arguments? Thanks :) Centaur271188 (talk) 13:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Centaur271188:. My English is not good. English is not my native language. I often use online-translator for English texts. I prefer format and thanked you for it. GAV80 (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Euro 2017 Group A

Really sorry, I totally didn't mean to delete your edit. My network was in trouble, and I had to wait to submit my edit.Hugopako (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Hugopako:. That's all right. GAV80 (talk) 16:57, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group I table

Hi, I think we should remove the note about Croatia-Kosovo match in that template. A similar incident happened in 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group G, Albania-Macedonia match, and we have no such note in Group G template. A note in 'Matches' section seems good enough :) Centaur271188 (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Centaur271188:. OK. I am agree with you. Can you remove note from template? GAV80 (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your fast reply. It is easy to remove the note, but I think I should tell you first. Centaur271188 (talk) 17:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group H table

Why I undid your edit in Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group H table. Estonia getting 2nd is theoretically possible. Tiebreakers in the groups are : Points, Overall goal difference. Estonia has 8 points, if they win last two matches they can get 14. It is possible that Greece won't get more than a point against Cyprus and Gibraltar. And finally Estonia needs to make up 22 goals disadvantage. Klõps (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification

It looks like in trying to correct bad edits at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification, you have violated WP:3RR. One must never repeatedly revert edits, even if they are right, and should discuss their issues about other editors work on appropriate Talk pages, more specifically the user talk page of the user you were reverting, or on the Talk page of the article in question if the dispute is about content rather than disruption itself. Continuous reverts on this page could mean a block from editing. Just FYI. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Volleyball players layout

Hello there is a discussion about the volleyball players layout being held in the WikiProject Volleyball talk page. Please visit us and help us with your contributions. --Osplace 17:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2017–18 UEFA Champions League Group C table

Hello, I'm Iggy the Swan. On the subject page, the only reason why I made the two edits was because I thought the table was not updated unlike the rest of the groups. I didn't realise a random IP vandalised the page so thanks. Iggy (talk) 17:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Tables

I also looked at the official tables by UEFA, and I now understand why the teams are ranked the way they are. Personally, I think it's stupid to go with head-to-head before overall because of this exact confusion, but that's the decision UEFA made. I'll keep this in mind for future edits. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 23:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018–19 UEFA Champions League

Your recent editing history at 2018–19 UEFA Champions League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Vanstrat (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GAV80. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GAV80. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1994 FIFA World Cup disciplinary record for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1994 FIFA World Cup disciplinary record is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 FIFA World Cup statistics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.