Jump to content

User talk:Henk Borgdorff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Henk Borgdorff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henk Borgdorff (February 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please have a quick look at WP:NOTYOU, a Biography needs inline citations, have a look at Help:Referencing for beginners and WP:MINREF, furthermore you need to disclose your ��Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before resubmitting, thanks.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Henk Borgdorff! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Still not how to do references. References are inserted into the body of the article following the content they support. By bracketing the reference content in ref and ref/, with each inside < >, that process creates a superscripted ref number in the text and puts the ref content in the References section. Inserting more refs automatically renumbers. David notMD (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henk Borgdorff (February 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 08:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Henk Borgdorff! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Editing page Henk Borgdorff, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

advice

[edit]
  • I and another editor have done some initial editing of the draft, removing unpublished work and making various corrections. If you edit it further yourself, dp mpt restpre this material. Rather, remember that an academic bio should:
An encyclopedia article is not a CV.  Make sure the article contains the full sequence of degrees and positions, with dates; a complete list of books published, with year, date, publisher, ISBN (referenced to WorldCat), and links to published reviews of them; and, (in the sciences)  the 5 most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them; any national level awards--(not junior awards or awards from their own university) Add major outside positions, such as president of major national organizations, and any positions of editor-in-chief ; Membership or minor offices in most societies, and service on editorial boards, do not count for much & are better omitted. Very sparse articles attract skepticism. as do those using vague claims and superlatives, or those that list all possible internal and external committes.

Membership or minor offices in most societies, and service on editorial boards, do not count for much & are better omitted. Very sparse articles attract skepticism. as do those using vague claims and superlatives, or those that list all possible internal and external committes.

And you must not copy from anh previous page, even your own published bio, except as provided by WP:DCM. DGG ( talk ) 07:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC) .[reply]

DGG ( talk ) Dear Editors, Thank you for your edits. If you allow me, I have replaced the heading ’Music teaching career’ with ’Academic career’, while from 2002 it involves research positions in Amsterdam. Gothenburg and Leiden. I noticed that at the end of the section Education, it says: [fact]. Should that stay there, or can I delete this? The article seems to me correct now. Can you tell me what the next step is? Henk Borgdorff Henk Borgdorff (talk) 11:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Henk Borgdorff! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Remove tags, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henk Borgdorff has been accepted

[edit]
Henk Borgdorff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Henk_Borgdorff&oldid=1030389477"