User talk:HighwayTyper

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Shizzlecraft1 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Category:Interstate Highways by State has been nominated for discussion

Category:Interstate Highways by State, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Indyguy (talk) 18:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:U.S. Highways by State has been nominated for discussion

Category:U.S. Highways by State, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Indyguy (talk) 19:30, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm making too much mistakes.

The bulk of my edits are from adding pages to categories that shouldn't even exist. Sorry for any inconvenience I might have caused while I was here. Maybe when I can think about what I've been doing wrong, I may consider rejoining, but for now I'm leaving. Bye!

Please don't feel discouraged. While being bold is certainly welcome, making large-scale changes such as adding every type of a particular article to a newly-created category may conflict with existing consensus. In the future, until you have some more editing experience under your belt, I would recommend asking at the appropriate discussion space (in this case, the talk page of WP:USRD) to determine if such a category would be helpful toward making the encyclopedia more easy to navigate. Thanks! --Kinu ^t/_c 20:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent categorization

I applaud your enthusiasm, however, I will note that the two categories created above will end up being deleted, and all of your edits to categorize articles into those categories will be reverted. Your edit count will not decrease, but your work will be for naught. You will have wasted other contributors' time dealing with the deletion discussion and reversions.

Edit count is not the best metric to use to grade an editor's contributions to Wikipedia. Rather, in most cases, the quality of the contributions is a better measure of the worth of an editor. Take a look at WP:USRD/NEW for some ideas on how to contribute to highway articles. There are many Stub- and Start-Class articles that can use expansion. If you're interested in creating maps, we have a tutorial on how to create and link KML files from articles, and once those are created, we could show you how to convert them to the map data file used for the interactive infobox maps. These activities are valuable and helpful. They're also much appreciated over adding unneeded categories to articles. Imzadi 1979 → 21:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

I put in your map request at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests. Cards84664 (talk) 21:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia requested photographs in United States

FYI the reason Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in United States didn't exist is because it's at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the United States - usually if an "obvious" category like that doesn't exist then it's because you've made a typo or similar.Le Deluge (talk) 12:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. HighwayTyper (talk) 20:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have responses.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:58, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wild Things (organization)

The article Wild Things (organization) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH₂₁^talk 09:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Latin script article

Could you please add at least one source to this article? Since the letter won't show up correctly in my browser, I can't verify if it exists and is real. Thanks in advance. b uidhe 19:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. HighwayTyper (talk) 19:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NYexitnotice

Template:NYexitnotice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Imzadi 1979 → 02:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anti-Indian sentiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

opinion

Not sure why you think it’s one sided. I put alleged because no one can agree if there was or not. If I put unfounded or something like that I’d agree. I just started editing some things but I’m not going to anymore because it seems everything is so divided from A to Z, people can’t even agree on grammar in the articles. Good luck to all. 198.183.179.81 (talk) 16:25, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Port Elizabeth. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 17:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your AIV Report

@Ad Orientem: What would I use instead? "Gender critical?" Though it seems like this term is not widespread among the group itself, and generally in common discourse I tend to observe the same acronym I used most often. HighwayTyper (talk) 00:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't heard the same criticism of the term gender critical, but am not overly familiar with it. However, I am aware that the term you used is almost exclusively employed by those on the other side of this hot button issue, and that it is widely considered offensive by those towards whom it is directed. Best to find some other less charged manner of expressing oneself. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HighwayTyper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to edit Wikipedia today, but there's an autoblock in the way. Could you please open it up for me so that I can continue to edit? HighwayTyper (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Now blocked directly due to Confirmed socking. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ponyo: Hol' up? WDYM "confirmed" socking? I don't have any sockpuppet accounts! I promise. I'm so confused as to what exactly's going on. If it's about the Gqeberha/Port Elizabeth moving thing, I already learned my lesson and served my (temporary) punishment. HighwayTyper (talk) 23:32, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HighwayTyper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise that I am not the same user as User:Test No 2 or User:Shizzlecraft1. I literally never heard those account names till my autoblock. Thanks! HighwayTyper (talk) 10:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 11:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sigh...

Well, goodbye everyone. I never committed sockpuppetry no matter what anyone says, but I guess there's no convincing anyone. Looks like I have no choice but to quit Wikipedia forever. I'm not going to create another account because that would be real sockpuppetry/block evasion. Hope I was able to improve the encyclopedia and edit well during my time here. Farewell, HighwayTyper (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]